Maker Pro
Maker Pro

AC Analysis common emitter configuration

studentLab

Apr 21, 2014
11
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
11
Hello and great day for all. Im asking for advice in this circuit. How to calculated Av for ac analysis in correct way.
gdfgdfg.png


Av1 =( R3//R6//R7// Beta(re +R9) ) / re+R9

Av2 = R8//R9 / re +R9

Using that formula i cannot get same with multisim simulator for Av1 and Av2
 

LvW

Apr 12, 2014
604
Joined
Apr 12, 2014
Messages
604
I see two small errors:
* First expression: Denominator (re+R4)
* Second expression: Numerator R8||R11 (instead of R8||R9).
 

duke37

Jan 9, 2011
5,364
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
5,364

I am not familiar with your // convention. All computer programs that I have used from algol onwards have just used brackets.

To look at Q2 in a simplified way, the voltage gain is the collector resistor/ emitter resistor.

The collector resistor is shunted by the load resistor, R11 so gain is 1.03k/1k = 1.03

Similarly, Q1 has a collector load of 1.2k so the gain is 8.

These calculations assume that the transistors have infinite gain and that the capacitors have zero reactance.
 

(*steve*)

¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥd
Moderator
Jan 21, 2010
25,505
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
25,505
R1 // R2 probably means 1/(1/R1 + 1/R2), i.e. R1 in parallel with R2
 

LvW

Apr 12, 2014
604
Joined
Apr 12, 2014
Messages
604
R1 // R2 probably means 1/(1/R1 + 1/R2), i.e. R1 in parallel with R2
Comparing in post#1 the circuit diagram with the formulas I think that the meaning of "//" is clear: parallel connection.
 

studentLab

Apr 21, 2014
11
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
11
Comparing in post#1 the circuit diagram with the formulas I think that the meaning of "//" is clear: parallel connection.

YEs im sorry my bad, it parallel. I fix the equation following LvW, and i get nearly same with simulator.

* ICq1 = IEq1
IEq1 = Vb1 - Vbe1 / R4 + R5
= 2.16 - 0.7 / 1k + 0.150k
= 1.27mA

* r'e get from r'e = Vt / ICq1 = 26mV / 1.27mA = 20.47 ohm.

Av1 =( R3||R6||/R7|| Beta(r'e +R4) ) / r'e+R4

Av1 = (3.6k x 10 / 3.6 + 10) || R7 || Beta(r'e +R4) ) / r'e+R4
Av1 = (2.647k x 2.2k / 2.647 + 2.2k) || Beta(r'e +R4) ) / r'e+R4
Av1 = (1.2k x (100x(20.47ohm + 150ohm)) / (1.2k + (100x(0.02047k + 0.150k)) / r'e+R4
Av1 = (1.2k x 17.04k) / (1.2k + 17.04k) / 0.02047k+0.150k
Av1 = 1.12k / 0.17k
Av1 = 6.59


Av2 = R8||R11 / r'e +R9
Av2 = ((3.6k x 1.5k) / (3.6k + 1.5k)) / 0.02047k + 1k
Av2 = 1.06k / 1.02k
Av2 = 1.04
 
Last edited:

studentLab

Apr 21, 2014
11
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
11
I am not familiar with your // convention. All computer programs that I have used from algol onwards have just used brackets.

To look at Q2 in a simplified way, the voltage gain is the collector resistor/ emitter resistor.

The collector resistor is shunted by the load resistor, R11 so gain is 1.03k/1k = 1.03

Similarly, Q1 has a collector load of 1.2k so the gain is 8.

These calculations assume that the transistors have infinite gain and that the capacitors have zero reactance.

Thank you duke37, it help me understand how to find voltage gain. But why simulator give 6.++ instead 8 for Av1?
 

(*steve*)

¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥd
Moderator
Jan 21, 2010
25,505
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
25,505
The simulator probably assumed something other than infinite gain in the transistor.

Assuming infinite gain for the transistor only works when the calculated stage gain is small compared with the actual transistor's gain.

The same thing is true for op-amps (that you may or may not have covered). However their open circuit gain is far higher than a single transistor and thus higher stage gains can be accurately predicted using the simple model that assumes infinite gain.
 

studentLab

Apr 21, 2014
11
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
11
Im confuse there diffrent formula to get Av:
Av = Vc / Vb
Av = Vout / Vin
Av = Rc / Re

In my DC analysis calculation:
VB1 = 2.16v
VC1 = 7.43v
VE1 = 1.46v

If i use
Av1 = VC1/VB1
= 7.43v / 2.16v
= 3.44

Av2 = Av1 since VB1, VC1 = VB2, VC2.

Av2 = 3.44

So in AC analysis i must use Av = RCtotal / REtotal right?

And when should i use Av = Vout / Vin?
 

(*steve*)

¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥd
Moderator
Jan 21, 2010
25,505
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
25,505
In the DC analysis, RE is 1150 ohms.

In the AC analysis, RE is 1000 ohms because the 150 ohm resistor is shunted by the much lower impedance of the capacitor (let's call it zero ohms)
 

LvW

Apr 12, 2014
604
Joined
Apr 12, 2014
Messages
604
Im confuse there diffrent formula to get Av:
Av = Vc / Vb
Av = Vout / Vin
Av = Rc / Re

In my DC analysis calculation:
VB1 = 2.16v
VC1 = 7.43v
VE1 = 1.46v
........
@studentLab:

1.) The gain of a circuit is a small-signal value (dynamic, differential) - hence, you must NOT use the ratio of DC values.
2.) The expression Av=Rc/Re is a rough estimate only. The correct formula is Av=Rc/(re+Re) with re=1/gm=Vt/Ic,
As you can see the rough approximation is valid for re<<Re only.
3.) The expression Vout/Vin is just the definition for gain and must be transferred to another formula (like the one in 2.) which contains parts values of the reöevant circuit.
 

studentLab

Apr 21, 2014
11
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
11
Thank you steve and LvW, it help me to understand better in this Av calculation. Only 2 month start studying Analog Measurement subject.
 

duke37

Jan 9, 2011
5,364
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
5,364
Gain of Q1
The simplified calculation assumes infinite transistor gain and neglected re. You calculated re as 20R so the emitter resistance is nearer 20 + 150 = 170
Gain calculation = 1200/170 = 7.0 which is very near the simulation of 6.9.

To get even closer, you could look at the effect of the reactance of the capacitors.

A good simulation saves a lot of work but even that is an approximation.
 
Top