Maker Pro
Maker Pro

aus.Re: DI 101?

E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Soundhaspriority said:
"Eeyore" wrote

Smile :)

I sent you email. Watch out for forgeries in that mode as well.

Got it. Very interesting if not altogther bemusing !

Graham
 
P

Peter Larsen

Jan 1, 1970
0
Eeyore said:
Name ONE country we 'raped'.

There was this issue of the Congreve rocket attack on Copenhagen ... it was
not called for and not required to reach the objective of neutralizing the
danish fleet so that it could not end up on Napoleons side. However to be
fair you - as a nation - did apologize indirectly via your effors in the
Vienna conference when we had what is technically known as A problem with
Schleswig later than century and in your support of the resolution of the
Schleswig border problem via a vote after The Great War and recently
directly.

When you - ie. Britain - went after the french navy in WW2 - they might have
been well off having read their history books with greater care, they would
quite possibly have given up if they had remebered Copenhagen. As for the
tactic as well as strategic necessity of both naval seizures, no contest, it
was an obviously required step for your nations survival.

Kind regards

Peter Larsen
 
S

-=Spudley=-

Jan 1, 1970
0
Eeyore said:
Sorry Peter but you're a million miles out of touch with reality.

Graham

Quite possibly it was this response of yours to Phil that prompted Peter to
comment. "You're not only a foul-mouthed shit, you're also an idiot."
 
P

Peter Larsen

Jan 1, 1970
0
-=Spudley=- said:
Quite possibly it was this response of yours to Phil that prompted
Peter to comment. "You're not only a foul-mouthed shit, you're also
an idiot."

I made no such comment.

Peter Larsen
 
B

bassett

Jan 1, 1970
0
Well we all await the outcome, but getting rid of Phillie, has been tried
before, and apart from a few lapse's where he disappeared for a week or so,
He's here, and here to stay.

So unless you have some secret formula, I think your drawing a very long
bow, When you say you will remove him.

As has been suggested, just do as the rest of us do and simply "kilfile" the
little bugger.

But like all things "time will tell"

And as I said before, Attempting to regulate who posts and who dosen't post
on a public unmoderated newsgroup, is impossable to control. regardless of
what you might know, or what you think you might know.
But we all wish you well in your endeavours

bassett
 
K

keithr

Jan 1, 1970
0
Eeyore said:
Michael A. Terrell said:
Moi said:
What is this Graham's problem? He seems rather pompous and cocksure of
himself (he knows 'excatly what [he's] doing' (wihs I always did but I
am
human...)... And perhaps obsessive... OK, we've all suffered from Phil.
Just
killfile him when he gets too much, and provided not too many blokes
reply
and quote him, life will be much easier!

He's British, and doesn't believe that England no longer rules the
known world. He doesn't accept that they don't own the United States,
and many other countries they raped over the years.

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

How about China during the opium war? It is the only time that I know of
that a country has declared war on another in order to protect it's "Rights"
to push hard drugs against that county's wishes.
 
M

Moi

Jan 1, 1970
0
keithr said:
Eeyore said:
Michael A. Terrell said:
Moi wrote:

What is this Graham's problem? He seems rather pompous and cocksure of
himself (he knows 'excatly what [he's] doing' (wihs I always did but I
am
human...)... And perhaps obsessive... OK, we've all suffered from
Phil. Just
killfile him when he gets too much, and provided not too many blokes
reply
and quote him, life will be much easier!

He's British, and doesn't believe that England no longer rules the
known world. He doesn't accept that they don't own the United States,
and many other countries they raped over the years.

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

How about China during the opium war? It is the only time that I know of
that a country has declared war on another in order to protect it's
"Rights" to push hard drugs against that county's wishes.
Actually, I am British too, though the past was beyond my control. (BTW,
and a neutralised <g> Australian to boot (or is that to thong?)). I don't
think it's his Britishness that does this. The arrogance is more like
America! There, I've stirred the pot now! Having said that, there are many
Americans I admire... and then again there are many I do NOT! Graham keeps
on declaring that he knows what he's doing, just you wait and see, etc. But
nothing! It's become a bit of an obsession with him. Not healthy,
obsessions. Most of us have become frustrated with Phil but now and then he
gives really good information. I killfiled him long ago to get rid of the
abuse, only to see his post quoted numerous times by others!
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
bassett said:
Well we all await the outcome, but getting rid of Phillie, has been tried
before, and apart from a few lapse's where he disappeared for a week or so,
He's here, and here to stay.

So unless you have some secret formula,
Yes.


I think your drawing a very long
bow, When you say you will remove him.

As has been suggested, just do as the rest of us do and simply "kilfile" the
little bugger.

But like all things "time will tell"

And as I said before, Attempting to regulate who posts and who dosen't post
on a public unmoderated newsgroup, is impossable to control. regardless of
what you might know, or what you think you might know.
But we all wish you well in your endeavours

Thank you.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Moi said:
"keithr" wrote
:
Moi wrote:

What is this Graham's problem? He seems rather pompous and cocksure of
himself (he knows 'excatly what [he's] doing' (wihs I always did but I
am human...)... And perhaps obsessive... OK, we've all suffered from
Phil. Just killfile him when he gets too much, and provided not too many blokes
reply and quote him, life will be much easier!

He's British, and doesn't believe that England no longer rules the
known world. He doesn't accept that they don't own the United States,
and many other countries they raped over the years.

Name ONE country we 'raped'.

How about China during the opium war? It is the only time that I know of
that a country has declared war on another in order to protect it's
"Rights" to push hard drugs against that county's wishes.
Actually, I am British too, though the past was beyond my control. (BTW,
and a neutralised <g> Australian to boot (or is that to thong?)). I don't
think it's his Britishness that does this. The arrogance is more like
America! There, I've stirred the pot now! Having said that, there are many
Americans I admire... and then again there are many I do NOT! Graham keeps
on declaring that he knows what he's doing, just you wait and see, etc. But
nothing!

Well I haven't done anything yet. And if Philthy cleans up his act I won't.

It's become a bit of an obsession with him. Not healthy,
obsessions. Most of us have become frustrated with Phil but now and then he
gives really good information. I killfiled him long ago to get rid of the
abuse, only to see his post quoted numerous times by others!

Which is why the other method is more effective.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Peter said:
There was this issue of the Congreve rocket attack on Copenhagen ... it was
not called for and not required to reach the objective of neutralizing the
danish fleet so that it could not end up on Napoleons side. However to be
fair you - as a nation - did apologize indirectly via your effors in the
Vienna conference when we had what is technically known as A problem with
Schleswig later than century and in your support of the resolution of the
Schleswig border problem via a vote after The Great War and recently
directly.

When you - ie. Britain - went after the french navy in WW2 - they might have
been well off having read their history books with greater care, they would
quite possibly have given up if they had remebered Copenhagen. As for the
tactic as well as strategic necessity of both naval seizures, no contest, it
was an obviously required step for your nations survival.

Ah. Wars. I thought the previous poster had the Empire more in mind.

Graham
 
I

Iain Churches

Jan 1, 1970
0
Well I haven't done anything yet. And if Philthy cleans up his act I
won't.

Surely your "deadline" has long passed Graham?
Your posts are starting to look a little vacuous.

Iain
 
B

bassett

Jan 1, 1970
0
Eeyore said:
Ah. Wars. I thought the previous poster had the Empire more in mind.

Graham

Talking of War's As far as Phillie's conserned, It might be time for him
to capitulate, and go and live on Macquarie island. well away from the
Internet. As his fate is sealed, according to some.

Meanwhile Graham, is issueing Tin Hats and the troops are in the trenches,
awaiting the impending confruntation of Good over Evil.

He will Go, He won't.
He's on his last warning, [that was 5 years ago] Phil wait's for a full
moon, to repel borders, on the ship of fools. He must change, he won't. It
might be easer to get him to change his socks.
He will be nice to everyone, He can't , he dosen't know how.

But like a lot of people I wish you would hurry up, it's getting cold,
standing out here attempting to protect
peace and harmany.

I,m sorry Graham, but somehow me thinks you have shot yourself in the foot.

bassett
 
K

keithr

Jan 1, 1970
0
Arny Krueger said:
Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

Nope, and in any case the British only ever had possession of a small part
of what is now called The United States Of America. Their successors now
known as Americans did a far more efficient job of raping the rest of it.

Yes but the original rulers were doing an effective job long before
South Africa

Not really, they did a much better job in other parts of Africa.
...immediately come to mind.

History and geography are not really strong subjects in America are they?

Keith
 
I

Iain Churches

Jan 1, 1970
0
keithr said:
Nope, and in any case the British only ever had possession of a small part
of what is now called The United States Of America. Their successors now
known as Americans did a far more efficient job of raping the rest of it.


Yes but the original rulers were doing an effective job long before


Not really, they did a much better job in other parts of Africa.


History and geography are not really strong subjects in America are they?

Keith

Living in "darkest Detroit", Arny, has probably never
visited either India or S.Africa, and so do not know the
high level of esteem in which the British are held there.

This is in stark contrast to Vietnam where tourists
are advised to wear a T-shirt on which is written
in Vietnamese. "I am not an American"

I have travelled extensively in all three countries.


Iain
 
L

liquidator

Jan 1, 1970
0
-=Spudley=- said:
Will you please try to keep up.

First, top posting is bad form.

Second, the comment was attributed to Peter in the reply.

Frankly you need to keep up.

Peter was challenging the reply attributing the comment to him when he
didn't say it.

Look at the post Peter replied to. Although you don't seem to know enough
about usenet to figure it out.
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Iain said:
Surely your "deadline" has long passed Graham?
Your posts are starting to look a little vacuous.

The deadline to modify his behaviour. I'm not a meanie. I haven't (yet)
seen any more cancer or death threats.

Besides, these things don't usually happen overnight (except one notorious
example which had the abuse crowd baying for my blood).

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
bassett said:
"Eeyore" wrote
Ah. Wars. I thought the previous poster had the Empire more in mind.

Talking of War's As far as Phillie's conserned, It might be time for him
to capitulate, and go and live on Macquarie island. well away from the
Internet. As his fate is sealed, according to some.

Meanwhile Graham, is issueing Tin Hats and the troops are in the trenches,
awaiting the impending confruntation of Good over Evil.

He will Go, He won't.
He's on his last warning, [that was 5 years ago] Phil wait's for a full
moon, to repel borders, on the ship of fools. He must change, he won't. It
might be easer to get him to change his socks.
He will be nice to everyone, He can't , he dosen't know how.

But like a lot of people I wish you would hurry up, it's getting cold,
standing out here attempting to protect
peace and harmany.

I,m sorry Graham, but somehow me thinks you have shot yourself in the foot.

Oh I doubt it. There are to date only 2 serious abusers I've failed to 'nick'
and besides, both have pretty much shut up now. Both use far cleverer ways of
covering their tracks than Philthy does.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Arny said:
"Eeyore" wrot


Three...

What is now known as The United States Of America

Raped ? In what way ? Might I draw your attention to how you treated
your own indigenous population ?


Oh, that assortment of moghul territories and mini kingdoms we turned
into a nation state and introduced democracy to. We built the Indian
Parliament around 1912 or so IIRC. Yup, that was rape for sure

South Africa

Cite ? I think you'll find the Boers were the beastly ones.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
keithr said:
"Arny Krueger" wrote

Nope, and in any case the British only ever had possession of a small part
of what is now called The United States Of America.

Exactly. The French had bits too.

Their successors now
known as Americans did a far more efficient job of raping the rest of it.


Yes but the original rulers were doing an effective job long before


Not really, they did a much better job in other parts of Africa.


History and geography are not really strong subjects in America are they?

I'd love to see an American history book. They must get these ideas from
somewhere.

The way the British treated their colonies, dominions etc is well demonstrated
by the continuing existence of the Commonwealth of Nations which has recently
even accepted one former non-British territory. There are are over 50 members
IIRC.

Graham
 
Top