Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Calculating Magnitude of two identical charges (Coulomb's Law)

Integrator741

Jun 16, 2013
125
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
125
Good Evening,

I was struggling with this question for about 30 min, I tried using Coulomb's Law Calculators, youtube and etc. Nothing helped. This question is from "Foundation Science For Engineers" book by Keith L. Watson, Chapter 26: Electric Charge;

Two positive charges of equal magnitude experience a repulsive force of 0.133 N between them when they are separated by a distance of 13 mm in air. (E0 = 8.85*10^-12).
?) What is the magnitude of each charge (A= 50nC)


I tried solving for Q1Q2 using (F=Q1*Q2/4*(pi)*E*r^2) - Did not get anything near 50nC.
Then I watched a video on youtube, where the guy used quadratic formula, but I didn't really get that.

Please help me to find a correct method of solving this question.

Thank you.
 

(*steve*)

¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥd
Moderator
Jan 21, 2010
25,510
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
25,510
show us your workings where you try to solve that equation.
 

Arouse1973

Adam
Dec 18, 2013
5,178
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
5,178
He you go.
Force.PNG

Edit: This only proves the formula, it doesn't tell you how to get the answer :)
Adam
 
Last edited:

Integrator741

Jun 16, 2013
125
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
125
show us your workings where you try to solve that equation.
Sorry mate for being so unorganized and messy, hopefully you can see that I have been trying.
 

Attachments

  • Charge131.jpg
    Charge131.jpg
    211.6 KB · Views: 119
  • Charge132.jpg
    Charge132.jpg
    229.6 KB · Views: 108
  • Charge130.jpg
    Charge130.jpg
    214.1 KB · Views: 110
  • Charge129.jpg
    Charge129.jpg
    290 KB · Views: 135
  • Charge128.pdf
    845.4 KB · Views: 83

Arouse1973

Adam
Dec 18, 2013
5,178
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
5,178
I have to go out now, for roast dinner :). One of the other guys will be along to help.
Cheers
Adam
 

(*steve*)

¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥd
Moderator
Jan 21, 2010
25,510
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
25,510
OK, so the first step is to check wikipedia for the correct formula. As a hint, Adam used it.

The formula as you have written it is so poorly written that I am not sure what Q1.Q2 is divided by. I suspect you've combined the correct formula (which uses ke) with the formula for determining ke from E0.

Do it step by step, and do it in a way that doesn't require me to view half a dozen pages of scribble. It should really only require a few lines.
 

Integrator741

Jun 16, 2013
125
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
125
OK, so the first step is to check wikipedia for the correct formula. As a hint, Adam used it.

The formula as you have written it is so poorly written that I am not sure what Q1.Q2 is divided by. I suspect you've combined the correct formula (which uses ke) with the formula for determining ke from E0.

Do it step by step, and do it in a way that doesn't require me to view half a dozen pages of scribble. It should really only require a few lines.

So I assume there is no difference if I use "f=(1/4 (pi)*8.85*10^-12)*(q1.q2/r^2)" or the one that Adam used? Because essentially they are the same? So what I am trying to do is solve for q1.q2 right?
 

Arouse1973

Adam
Dec 18, 2013
5,178
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
5,178
Your welcome! However if the two charges are different and of different sign, then that's a whole different thing.
Adam
 
Top