Bruce Ratcliffe
- Aug 5, 2012
- 14
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2012
- Messages
- 14
Dear Delta Prime,This is a trick question right?
You have 120 volts RMS applied directly to the 4017b my apologies via a relay to the 4017b.
"Max Smoke!"![]()
Know nothing? Then I know even less.. Thank you for your explanation.Bruce (Know Nothing, but not letting that stop him from playing electronics) Ratcliffe
Thaks so much Crutschow! I see my understanding of electronics is as a drop to the tank of a pre-lows flush toilet tank (~5 gallons = 454,600 drops) I have no idea what "PULSE (4 0 0 1U 1U 5MS 10) .tran 0.5s uic" means but I can see the reason for the 1N 4148 (to allow potentially dangerous back emf developed when coil is turned off to be harmlessly dissipated. and the 470 uF cap makes sense, too. I'll try both this weekend : )
Bruce (Know Nothing, but not letting that stop him from playing electronics) Ratcliffe
Not likely, unless it's a really large relay.A 1N4148 may be too small a diode for this application.
The PULSE command determines the characteristics of the signal generated by the voltage source (generator) V1 (here a 4V to 0V pulse that's on for 5ms with a 10ms period, 1µs rise and fall times, for 10 pulses total, and then stays at the initial voltage (4V) for the rest of the time).I have no idea what "PULSE (4 0 0 1U 1U 5MS 10) .tran 0.5s uic" means
That relay module has a built-in transistor driver with a diode across the coil, so you just have to apply power from your battery and directly connect the output of the CD4017 to the control input, no added transistor needed.BTW, here's a shot of the relay I'm using. Cute little thing.
BruceView attachment 58158
It looks correct, apart from the fact that there should be a reverse-biased diode (e.g a 1N4148) across the relay coil to protect the BC547 (and possibly the IC) from the back-emf voltage spike created when the coil is de-energised . Good luck.I'm sure it will work.
Why, thanks, Alec_t. I'll add that most sensible component in when I jump back to working on this project this weekend. BruceIt looks correct, apart from the fact that there should be a reverse-biased diode (e.g a 1N4148) across the relay coil to protect the BC547 (and possibly the IC) from the back-emf voltage spike created when the coil is de-energised . Good luck.