Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Dental filling radio reception?

B

Bob Masta

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi, everyone.

For years I've heard vague stories about people receiving radio
broadcasts through their dental work. The stories have all the
characteristics of a classic urban legend, and I'm pretty sure
that's exactly what they are. Although I have no doubt that
some people *think* they are hearing radio broadcasts, I
believe that if proper tests would have been conducted it
could have been shown that these were really mild auditory
hallucinations.

So my question here has to do with the pure physics of a
supposed dental radio receiver. The proponents usually
do some hand-waving about the possibility of a diode
forming in connection with a metallic filling or bridgework.
The possibility seems at least plausible (any thoughts on that?),
but they never seem to follow it any further. OK, so what is
this diode going to connect to? How is the signal going to
get transduced into sound? Etc, etc.

But the real show-stopper, I think, would be the fact that
the whole "radio" is inside the mouth, surrounded by
conductive tissue with no antenna protruding... a pretty
good Faraday cage, I reckon. (Or maybe the radio
only works when you stick out your toungue...!)

So the question is just how good of an RF shield
is conductive tissue at normal AM or FM frequencies?
Anyone have any data, or know how to compute it
if we come up with some estimates for tissue conductivity
and thickness?

Thanks!


Bob Masta
dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom

D A Q A R T A
Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis
www.daqarta.com
 
M

M.Daughtry

Jan 1, 1970
0
You need to catch the re-run of Myth Busters where they tested this very
thing. IIRC (because I really wasn't paying a whole lot of attention) their
conclusion was that it was plausible but not very likely (someone chime in
if I'm wrong).
 
J

John Popelish

Jan 1, 1970
0
M.Daughtry said:
You need to catch the re-run of Myth Busters where they tested this very
thing. IIRC (because I really wasn't paying a whole lot of attention) their
conclusion was that it was plausible but not very likely (someone chime in
if I'm wrong).

I didn't see the show, but the antenna efficiency for this sort of
thing is extremely low. You would have to sit beside the transmitting
antenna to have a chance of it happening.
 
It's still speculated... see:

http://www.snopes.com/radiotv/tv/fillings.htm

I don't have any idea how it'd work, much less how the signal would be
demodulated...
However, I'd like to play devil's advocate and point out a few
things... first is that tissue does not make a good faraday cage. You
are a better conductor than rubber, but MUCH worse than copper. UHF
and VHF passes through you relatively easily.

Secondly, do you want to assume that, if this legend is true, the
filling induces sound in the mouth? Electrical impulses transmitted
around your auditory nerve definately seem like sound to the beholder.
Maybe that's the mechanism...?

Lastly, who's to say the filling acts as an antenna, a diode, or a
battery? A filling in a saline solution, surrounded by nerves, bone,
and other tissue might act completely differently than it would
stand-alone.

I dunno if it's true or not... it'd be interesting to get concrete
proof.

Dave
 
A

Andrew Holme

Jan 1, 1970
0
John said:
I didn't see the show, but the antenna efficiency for this sort of
thing is extremely low. You would have to sit beside the transmitting
antenna to have a chance of it happening.

Sit beside the transmitter, chewing on a mouth full of OA91 germanium
diodes.
 
J

John Popelish

Jan 1, 1970
0
Andrew said:
Sit beside the transmitter, chewing on a mouth full of OA91 germanium
diodes.

Aluminum foil gum wrappers against amalgam filling might also rectify
a bit.
 
J

Joe McElvenney

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi,

Then there's getting speech or music out of the gas stove.
That is a little more plausible as I seem to recall that a flame
can be used as an RF detector.

I once got a stream of water out of my electric wall socket
but that was just the folks upstairs leaving a water tap on and
then going on holiday.


Cheers - Joe
 
S

Stranger in the dark

Jan 1, 1970
0
Joe McElvenney said:
Hi,

Then there's getting speech or music out of the gas stove.
That is a little more plausible as I seem to recall that a flame
can be used as an RF detector.

I once got a stream of water out of my electric wall socket
but that was just the folks upstairs leaving a water tap on and
then going on holiday.


Cheers - Joe

Ok, here's one for ya....

I was about 12 at the time. We had gone away for a couple hours - my mother,
younger brother and myself. We merely went to the store to pick up a couple
things, a total of 10 miles round trip. My Dad and I believe one other
person was at home. There was a hail storm came through that day and lasted
about 15 minutes. The house had a basement, 1st floor and 2nd floor. The
first floor in the kitchen - the dome which hung from the kitchen ceiling
lamp had hail and water in it. There was NO leaks in the roof, no leaks
evident in the bedroom above the kitchen. No way we could think of, for the
water/hail to have gotten in that dome. While I'm sure there must be some
reasonable explanation for it, it sure defied one and still does - at least
to the writing of this. That was the first and last we noticed that sort of
thing - in our time there.
 
D

Don A. Gilmore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Stranger in the dark said:
Ok, here's one for ya....

I was about 12 at the time. We had gone away for a couple hours - my mother,
younger brother and myself. We merely went to the store to pick up a couple
things, a total of 10 miles round trip. My Dad and I believe one other
person was at home. There was a hail storm came through that day and lasted
about 15 minutes. The house had a basement, 1st floor and 2nd floor. The
first floor in the kitchen - the dome which hung from the kitchen ceiling
lamp had hail and water in it. There was NO leaks in the roof, no leaks
evident in the bedroom above the kitchen. No way we could think of, for the
water/hail to have gotten in that dome. While I'm sure there must be some
reasonable explanation for it, it sure defied one and still does - at least
to the writing of this. That was the first and last we noticed that sort of
thing - in our time there.


Maybe Jesus put it there...or your little brother.
 
S

Stranger in the dark

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don A. Gilmore said:
message



Maybe Jesus put it there...or your little brother.

Nah, don't think so...... Little brother couldn't reach it and beside, he
was with us! Jesus - well, to each his own - but I don't think such a
person/entity would waste their time doing stupid tricks like that. Try
again.

The Shadow
 
D

Don A. Gilmore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Stranger in the dark said:
Nah, don't think so...... Little brother couldn't reach it and beside, he
was with us! Jesus - well, to each his own - but I don't think such a
person/entity would waste their time doing stupid tricks like that. Try
again.


Batman?
 
D

Don Bruder

Jan 1, 1970
0
Joe McElvenney said:
Hi,

Then there's getting speech or music out of the gas stove.
That is a little more plausible as I seem to recall that a flame
can be used as an RF detector.

More interesting is using a flame as a speaker.

Yes, this one's actually for real, and *INCREDIBLY* effective. Once
things are set up and adjusted properly, it can be tweaked to produce
enough volume to practically blow you into the next county. I don't
claim full understanding of the workings, but I've seen it in action,
and I was *VERY* impressed, both with the quality and quantity of sound
output. A propane flame that looked to be about 10 inches tall from my
vantage point in the bleachers was WAY more than adequate for use as a
PA speaker at the county fairgrounds where the demonstration was done,
and was reported to be heard, clearly enough to be intelligble, more
than a mile away.

Of course, the heat that came as a by-product, and the clear space
required to prevent it from being a fire hazard, was something of a
downside. (The demo was set up in the infield of the harness-racing
track)
 
R

Robert Monsen

Jan 1, 1970
0
Bob said:
Hi, everyone.

For years I've heard vague stories about people receiving radio
broadcasts through their dental work. The stories have all the
characteristics of a classic urban legend, and I'm pretty sure
that's exactly what they are. Although I have no doubt that
some people *think* they are hearing radio broadcasts, I
believe that if proper tests would have been conducted it
could have been shown that these were really mild auditory
hallucinations.

So my question here has to do with the pure physics of a
supposed dental radio receiver. The proponents usually
do some hand-waving about the possibility of a diode
forming in connection with a metallic filling or bridgework.
The possibility seems at least plausible (any thoughts on that?),
but they never seem to follow it any further. OK, so what is
this diode going to connect to? How is the signal going to
get transduced into sound? Etc, etc.

But the real show-stopper, I think, would be the fact that
the whole "radio" is inside the mouth, surrounded by
conductive tissue with no antenna protruding... a pretty
good Faraday cage, I reckon. (Or maybe the radio
only works when you stick out your toungue...!)

So the question is just how good of an RF shield
is conductive tissue at normal AM or FM frequencies?
Anyone have any data, or know how to compute it
if we come up with some estimates for tissue conductivity
and thickness?

Thanks!

Lucille Ball told a story on "The Dick Cavett Show" about picking up
morse on her fillings after a trip to the dentist. She claims that she
was driving by a big short wave transmitter. There is also a claim that
she captured a Japanese spy during WWII with it...

When I was a kid, I used to hear morse late at night. I had several
large fillings. My guess is that a neighbor had a big shortwave
transmitter, and used it at night. I don't know morse, so it may have
been an auditory hallucination, but it was repeated at least a few
times, and, well, it really sounded like morse. Very spooky.

One theory is that is amalgam in fillings creates a diode. The strong
wave rolling across it creates electrical impulses, which trick the
auditory system (which is about a cm away, through that conductive media
you were referring to) into believing there was sound. It probably only
works for big fillings on the uppers, far back in the mouth, and then
only with certain shapes and depth of filling, and formulas of amalgam.

--
Regards,
Robert Monsen

"Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
- Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon,
on why his works on celestial mechanics make no mention of God.
 
Y

YD

Jan 1, 1970
0
Aluminum foil gum wrappers against amalgam filling might also rectify
a bit.

BTDT. The galvanic current going through the root keeps you way too
busy getting rid of it to bother listening for radio emissions.

- YD.
 
B

Bob Masta

Jan 1, 1970
0
On 6 Jan 2005 08:53:53 -0800, [email protected] wrote:

However, I'd like to play devil's advocate and point out a few
things... first is that tissue does not make a good faraday cage. You
are a better conductor than rubber, but MUCH worse than copper. UHF
and VHF passes through you relatively easily.

Any idea where to get numbers to put on this? I'm especially
interested in AM frequencies, simply because AM broadcasts
can be easily detected, as in a crystal radio. But figures for
the other bands would certainly be of interest.
Secondly, do you want to assume that, if this legend is true, the
filling induces sound in the mouth? Electrical impulses transmitted
around your auditory nerve definately seem like sound to the beholder.
Maybe that's the mechanism...?

Electrical pulses transmitted directly to your auditory nerve, as in
an auditory prosthesis (cochlear implant) sound like buzzing. In
order to get any semblance of the original sound you need a
carefully orchestrated stimulation of multiple frequency regions.
This is a really difficult task, with a lot of good people working
hard on it. The problem is that the ear is not at all like a
radio or telephone. It's a parallel device, with all frequencies
analyzed while still acoustic, and transmitted as thousands
of discrete frequencies on individual auditory nerve fibers.
Each fiber's firing rate corresponds to the intensity of the
particular frequency of the corresponding sensory cell.
There is no place in the system where you can insert an
electrical audio signal and have it interpreted by the brain
as the original sound. (Unless perhaps your signal was
a buzzer!)
Lastly, who's to say the filling acts as an antenna, a diode, or a
battery? A filling in a saline solution, surrounded by nerves, bone,
and other tissue might act completely differently than it would
stand-alone.

Yes, my expectation is that if there is any diode junction at all,
it's between metal and an electrolyte.


Best regards,


Bob Masta
dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom

D A Q A R T A
Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis
www.daqarta.com
 
M

Matt J. McCullar

Jan 1, 1970
0
Not dental, but a friend of mine claimed he once heard a radio station over
a flashlight. This happened back in the 1970s and he said he'd go into the
kitchen late at night for a snack, and in the dead quiet darkness he could
barely hear someone talking. Very strange; he didn't believe in ghosts but
it took him a while to find where the voices were coming from: a flashlight
held onto the side of the fridge by a magnet.

He didn't say what he did with the flashlight, as this was many years ago,
but it would be interesting to dissect it today and see what was causing it.
Perphaps some battery acid was acting as a rectifier between a battery
terminal and a big spring. Once he had satisfied himself as to the source,
he said he just left the flashlight alone and let it freak out his relatives
who thought the kitchen was haunted.

My father told me he once heard a story of someone claiming to hear a radio
station in her kitchen oven. This was the old convection oven, the kind
built into the wall. He said it probably had something to do with old
grease and other food-related crud building up against some metal contacts
inside the oven.

I remember when I was a kid, picking up WBAP-820 AM radio very clearly over
my little 3" reel-to-reel tape recorder speaker whenever I touched my finger
to the terminals of the playback head. I guess my body was acting like a
capacitor/antenna. WBAP is a big powerhouse and at the time I lived in the
same city (Fort Worth).
 
B

Bob Masta

Jan 1, 1970
0
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:16:08 GMT, "Matt J. McCullar"
I remember when I was a kid, picking up WBAP-820 AM radio very clearly over
my little 3" reel-to-reel tape recorder speaker whenever I touched my finger
to the terminals of the playback head. I guess my body was acting like a
capacitor/antenna. WBAP is a big powerhouse and at the time I lived in the
same city (Fort Worth).

The fact that the body is a good antenna for AM is one of the things
that makes me think the mouth would make a good Faraday cage.
It must be a pretty good conductor at those wavelengths. But
I'd sure like to be able to put some numbers on it. How does one
determine the degree of Faraday screening, given the conductance
(or whatever) of the screening material?

Thanks!


Bob Masta
dqatechATdaqartaDOTcom

D A Q A R T A
Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis
www.daqarta.com
 
Bob said:
On 6 Jan 2005 08:53:53 -0800, [email protected] wrote:



Any idea where to get numbers to put on this? I'm especially
interested in AM frequencies, simply because AM broadcasts
can be easily detected, as in a crystal radio. But figures for
the other bands would certainly be of interest.

Not off the top of my head. Some mil-standards/specs might have that
information. The statement "the body is a good conductor" can be true
or false, depending on what you're using as reference. It's a great
conductor compared to rubber, concrete, etc. It's an extremely poor
conductor compared to copper, gold, even lead.

I'm guessing that microwaves and x-ray machines would be worthless if
meat was a good conductor.
Electrical pulses transmitted directly to your auditory nerve, as in
an auditory prosthesis (cochlear implant) sound like buzzing.

That statement is incorrect. If cochlear implants only sounded like
buzzing, then people wouldn't have them implanted. I think you're
refering to the lower quality of the sound compared to natural hearing?
Perhaps this quote could help:

"The sounds heard through an implant are different from the normal
hearing sounds, and have been described as artificial or "robotlike."
This is because the implant's handful of electrodes cannot hope to
match the complexity of a person's 15,000 hair cells."

http://www.chclibrary.org/micromed/00043180.html
In
order to get any semblance of the original sound you need a
carefully orchestrated stimulation of multiple frequency regions.

Multiple frequencies you mean? Sound can be a single frequency or a
superposition of many.
This is a really difficult task, with a lot of good people working
hard on it. The problem is that the ear is not at all like a
radio or telephone. It's a parallel device, with all frequencies
analyzed while still acoustic, and transmitted as thousands
of discrete frequencies on individual auditory nerve fibers.
Each fiber's firing rate corresponds to the intensity of the
particular frequency of the corresponding sensory cell.

I don't believe that's a correct statement. If it was solely dependant
on frequency, then you couldn't tell the difference between a 50Hz
square wave, a 50Hz sine wave, or a 50Hz tuba note.

Just because everyday sound usually has many different origins
operating at different frequencies doesn't mean you can't hear a single
noise at a single frequency.
There is no place in the system where you can insert an
electrical audio signal and have it interpreted by the brain
as the original sound. (Unless perhaps your signal was
a buzzer!)

Isn't that the "goal" of a cochlear implant? To simulate real-world
noise in the auditory nerve? As stated above, just because the implant
can't mimic the the hairs in your ear perfectly doesn't mean it can't
be done. That's a current-day limitation, not a permanent one.

Dave
 
S

SioL

Jan 1, 1970
0
Bob Masta said:
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:16:08 GMT, "Matt J. McCullar"


The fact that the body is a good antenna for AM is one of the things
that makes me think the mouth would make a good Faraday cage.
It must be a pretty good conductor at those wavelengths. But
I'd sure like to be able to put some numbers on it. How does one
determine the degree of Faraday screening, given the conductance
(or whatever) of the screening material?

How about stuffing AM radio up your arse and checking whether
you can still hear the audio from the radio station?

Or doing the same with your mouth.

Just an idea :)

SioL
 
Top