Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Don't Touch My Junk!

T

TheGlimmerMan

Jan 1, 1970
0
Another one for the list, Michael.


Trust me, retard boys. It got through.

They are both about as retarded as it gets, and so are you, little
girl.
 
S

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt

Jan 1, 1970
0
Nope. My filter got that one also. Manic depressives lend themselves
to pattern recognition ;-)

If you'd stop feeding the troll we'd all be free of this shit.

...Jim Thompson

Total bullshit.

As stated earlier. The only way the pussy could have filtered that
post is by filtering the entire cox domain, which is not a valid claim of
filtration, filtering the aoie posts, which is also not a proper claim of
filtration, OR by filtering on the client I used. All are invalid as
claims of filtering me, and there is no other pattern, you lying piece of
shit.

So, I am going to change my client, and I will actually do what you
retarded fucks have been claiming I have been doing.

Note that all of my past nyms have always had elements that allowed
ANYONE that actually has a brain to know that it was me, and that was
deliberate, so all of you pussies that said I was trying to get around
your filters are retarded fucks. If I wanted to do that all this time, I
could have. Quite easily. I have always known that, and have never
tried to be that way. All of my nyms were whimsical, and all of you
retarded twits used words you heard before you even knew the meanings of
them. You are worse than a kid running a game server that kicks folks
off that are whipping his ass at the game.

However, IF I wanted to, there is not a goddamned thing this Terrell
retard, nor this Thompson retard could do to filter me, as I DO have
enough brains to do what has been being claimed this entire time.
I just NEVER have actually tried to bypass anything. My posts have
ALWAYS had defining element is EVERY nym that I place there deliberately.

If I was trying to get past you foolish retards, I could have. Whay
would I put similar "@so-and-so.org" in each nym if I were trying to
hide.
Are you really so fucking retarded that you actually think I was thinking
I was getting past your fucktard filters?

I could care less, but zero is as low as it goes. IF you want me to
prove that, I can.

Want to test that claim, you fucking lying retard? Do you actually want
me to act like you claims have declared so many headfucked years?

Because if I were trying to, you would NOT be filtering me, ever.

I know more about Usenet and posting and Identifiers than you ever have
or ever will, and if my intent was EVER to have defeated some pathetic
asswipe's filter, I would have, idiot.

I can get up to (or more) three dedicated IP addresses per day, and
there is nothing you can do about it, and they will be different each
time.

That is BEFORE I would choose to post on some local, unprotected
wireless hook on some lamer's DSL connection.

You are as clueless as it gets, Thompson, and if I wanted to be around
you and the MikeTard's playbaby bullshit, I would. Want proof? Say the
word, fucktard.
 
F

FatBytestard

Jan 1, 1970
0
You're right, Jim, but sometimes I just can't stop myself. I'll give
it a rest now.


You're so full of shit.

Same Old Story.
 
D

Don Klipstein

Jan 1, 1970
0
Wrong on the "high end IR imagers" remark. It is total bullshit, as
early IR imagery was fuzzy focus, at best.

Now... JUST now, they are getting higher clarity focus on IR imagery,
but that is just NOW happening, and one does NOT see the detail level
UNDER clothing like this guy is touting EITHER. The statement is NOT
TRUE.

And yes, I agree that we don't need any more fucking X-rays injected
into our bodies. We have MRI and CAT, and others, and the bastard
doctors had better start using them!

<SNIP from here>

CAT uses X-rays, generally with more than is used in simply shooting
X-rays through one's body onto film or a planar sensor.
 
D

Don Klipstein

Jan 1, 1970
0
<In short, discussion of filtering posts by the one with 80-plus nyms>

There does get to the matter of filtering posts by content. Maybe
sometime soon I will implement such a filter, and a newsreader that
supports such a filter. I have been told (I'm not sure correctly) that
this can be done with Thunderbird.

Most of the posts by the one with 80-plus nyms can be filtered on basis
of a somewhat short list of choice words and phrases, including
5th-grade-like usage of the word "retard" as a noun and usage of
word-alone "fucktard". Such a filter appears likely to me to snag more
posts by his fellow 5th-grade-or-so-maturity annoyances than posts that
most others would prefer to not be filtered.

I do apologize for hereby necessitating any need to expand any such
filters already implimented - probably not by a lot.
 
R

Rich Grise

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don said:
<In short, discussion of filtering posts by the one with 80-plus nyms>

There does get to the matter of filtering posts by content. Maybe
sometime soon I will implement such a filter, and a newsreader that
supports such a filter. I have been told (I'm not sure correctly) that
this can be done with Thunderbird.

It generally takes about one post for me to spot him, and it's one keystroke
and one mouseclick to plonk. :)

Cheers!
Rich
 
L

lurch

Jan 1, 1970
0
It generally takes about one post for me to spot him,

Which clearly describes the full extent of your skill set.
and it's one keystroke
and one mouseclick to plonk. :)

Which clearly describes the full extent of your missing intellectual
faculties.
 
R

Rich Grise

Jan 1, 1970
0
Rich said:
It generally takes about one post for me to spot him, and it's one
keystroke and one mouseclick to plonk. :)

Cheers!
Rich

'scuse me. One control-key stroke, and TWO mouseclicks.

Cheers!
Rich
 
J

JW

Jan 1, 1970
0
Another one for the list, Michael.

I think he's getting more angry with the approach of Christmas, what with
being alone and all. That and a little dick, of course.
 
Top