M
MooseFET
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
I disagree. The essence of a limit cycle is a persistent nonzero output
with a zero input. Its time variation or lack of same is a detail.
In order for something to be a "red apple" it must first be an
"apple". In order for something to be a "limit cycle" it must first
be a "cycle". Since the single pole case doesn't cycle, I don't agree
with calling it some special type of "cycle".
You can if you want, but it doesn't lead to any useful predictions that
I know of.
Well notice the useful prediction that I said it shows about the
single pole IIR and then you will know of a useful prediction that it
leads to.
What does it mean to say that something has infinite gain
over zero range?
We do that sort of thing all the time. Any time you talk about a step
function you say that it steps from one value to the other over a zero
length time.