Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Frequncy generator

A

Andrew Holme

Jan 1, 1970
0
GPG said:

I would say not.

The 40Hz comparison frequency is too low. That's going to force you to use
a very low loop bandwidth, which will make it slow to lock.

You'd probably need to convert the mixer inputs to sine waves first; and
it'll produce sum and difference products, so you'd need a good low pass
filter to remove the 10.4-13 MHz sum product whilst passing the .4-4 MHz
difference. Finally, you'd need to square-up the sine waves again before
feeding them to the dividers.

If the aim is to produce low frequencies with high resolution, how about a
DDS?

If you want a PLL with small steps, consider Fractional-N.
 
G

GPG

Jan 1, 1970
0
I would say not.

The 40Hz comparison frequency is too low. That's going to force you to use
a very low loop bandwidth, which will make it slow to lock.
That is a concern. Once locked the loop filter can be slow, and I had
thought to use a lock detect circuit to change the current of the
detector for speeding up lock time.
You'd probably need to convert the mixer inputs to sine waves first; and
it'll produce sum and difference products, so you'd need a good low pass
filter to remove the 10.4-13 MHz sum product whilst passing the .4-4 MHz
difference. Finally, you'd need to square-up the sine waves again before
feeding them to the dividers.
Had a D FF in mind for that part, only the difference out.
If the aim is to produce low frequencies with high resolution, how about a
DDS?
Had a brief look, still reading.
If you want a PLL with small steps, consider Fractional-N.
Will research. Thanks.
 
Top