# How to cause magnetic inteference in sample playback MIDI synths?

R

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi:

Please assist me with the following.

I would like to make some replicable magnetic electronic nanobots that
will search for sample playback MIDI synths in any part of the world
and attach to the digital chips of sample playback MIDI synths. These
nanobots should contain magnetic receivers that will extract any
random environmental magnetic audio signals from 2 kHz to 50 kHz
[excluding spikes, square-waves, white noise, brown noise, pink noise
and bass sounds]. The nanobots then amplify those signals to the point
where they would significantly interfere with -- and cause inductive
crosstalk in -- the audio signals in the digital electronic chips of
the sample playback MIDI synths. This will cause sample playback MIDI
synths to be full of annoying -- and perhaps even frightening --
auditory disruptions from environmental magnetic interference.

That way all companies will be forced to make *real* synths and the
listeners will be forced to adapt to the excellent audio quality of
*real* synths. For those who miss their stinky human kakaa foam of
sample playback synths, well, f--k them!

Note: The magnetic signals that interfere with those digital chips
should be purely-analog. I just love it when purely-analog magnetic
signals cause significant disruptions in purely-digital chip-based
parts of electronic devices that I don't like. Sample playback MIDI
synths are an example of digital electronic devices that I don't like
so I want to victimize them in this manner -- i.e. via magnetic
inteferences.

On the Creative website -- forums.creative.com -- I am known as
"CMS220"

In the above link, is where I take revenge against the following:

1. Creative Technology for no longer making or upgrading Creative
Music Synth [220]

2. Customers who like -- or don't mind -- sample playback MIDI synths

3. Customers who dislike -- or don't care for - Creative Music Synth
[220]

On the Creative Technology site, I first asked my questions politely
but no one answered me. I then got frustrated and vented all my anger.
Now those jerks know how I feel.

I lost control of my temper and used very bad words. As a result, any
computer with my home IP address cannot access the Creative forums.
Also, if I login under the name "CMS220" in any part of the world, the
because I logged in under CMS220. They've got some auto-ban type of
feature, it seems.

It started off like this. I asked in the Creative Technology
http://forums.creative.com as politely as I could. I waited a couple
of weeks. No response. I asked again as politely as I could, waited
another few weeks. Again no answers. I tried on the third and last
time as politely as I could. AGAIN, no answers!!!

I then got impatient and aggressive. I started venting my anger in
those forums. I used bad words. As a result, they've permanently
banned my IP and I can no longer access their forums. What a buncha
jerks. Yes, I did get carried away with the foul language but hey, can
ya blame me?

So I can no longer sign-in under CMS220. I got a new username "SB16-
ISA-FM" and logged in from another network outside my house. I started
venting my anger again using colorful language. One of the Creative
Technology companymen then sent me a warning note, in which he/she/it
threatened to contact my ISP and shut-down my internet connection.
What those fools don't realize is that I can log in under any name
from any network that I am given access to. It doesn't have to be from
my house.

Maybe if Creative Technology weren't made up of such jerks, then I
wouldn't have started spamming their forums in the 1st place. So its
not my fault.

I would like a real Creative Music Synth [220]. Doesn't have to be in
a sound card. It could be a keyboard, a MIDI box or in any other form.

Sadly, its not gonna happen because the mechanism by which Creative
Music Synth [220] is kept classified as top-secret by Creative
Technology Ltd. CMS220 is no longer made yet the sick @$$company still keeps the working of CMS220 a secret. Creative Technology is a stubborn piece of crap. F--k those stingy secretive bastards. I hate sick sample playback MIDI synths. I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non- emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there. FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its all kakaa-like emulation. SB16 PCI has the disadvantages of SB16 ISA [e.g. limitation to 16-bit resolution] without the advantages [e.g. *real* FM synthesis]. All SB16 PCIs should be burned in oxyacetylene flames. AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'. I hate it though because it is emulation. The Avance sound card has 'Avance FM synth', but its also a real stinker as it isn't a real synth. The evil PCI loves to inflict pain on other types of slot -- ISA being the unfortunate victim. PCI cards don't contain real FM synths. Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only 'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human diarrhea kakaa foam. I don't understand why a PCI card cannot contain a real FM synth like Creative Music Synth [220]. Is there a technical barrier to this? I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness, warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous -- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation. Creative Music Synth [220] = SB16 ISA's FM synth = my favorite MIDI synth. I don't care for other MIDI synths. Creative Music Synth [220] is: 1. Real and 2. Digital and 3. Hardware and 4. Real-time All other FM synths are okay. Wavetables are also good. But I don't care for them. Here are my ratings for *soundcard* MIDI synths in the order from best to worst: 1. Creative Music Synth [220] 2. All digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220] 3. Wavetables, non-FM digital synths, analog [non-digital] synths 4. Sample playback synths Sample playback synths are the worst. Sample playback synths STEEEENK!!!! Sample playback MIDI synths are the worst audio equipment ever. They are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy, irritating, farty, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying. I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent. The only thing about Creative Technology that I like is their Creative Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they are a piece of kakaa. Creative Technology is one f--king piece of crap that provides sh--ty customer service. Their tech support is so limited. Creative Technology used to be such a great company 13 years ago. Now there are nothing but stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-humans. I've asked them about Creative Music Synth [220] -- through a variety of means, including but not limited to phone, fax, and their online tech support -- only to be totally-ignored. I asked them about this for the past 5 years. Never got a decent answer. In addition, most of their online tech support is pre-written garbage. Creative Technology also uses such f--ked up sickening disgusting sample playback synths in their PCI cards. I wish that a gang of persons who support Creative Music Synth [220] would attack Creative Technology and force them to make hardware versions of Creative Music Synth [220] -- in PCI cards that are compatible with PCI slots and Windows XP -- upgraded from 16-bit to 32- bit and from 44.1 KHz to 192 KHz. And from there, keep on upgrading! When XP and PCI are obsolete then Creative Technology should be forced to make even newer hardware versions of CMS220 -- with even wider bit- resolutions and higher sample-rates -- that are compatible with the newer hardwares and softwares that will exist in that future time. If Creative Technology refuses, I hope the CMS220-advocating gang ties up the people who make up that company and torturously forces them to repeatedly listen to sample playback MIDI synths and emulation until those Creative personnel are annoyed with burning headaches and are deathly desperate for an escape. Only then will the people of Creative Technology do the right thing -- make upgraded versions of Creative Music Synth [220]. A rich spoiled-rotten company like Creative deserves to be heinously hijacked and forced to do their duties. The least Creative Technology Ltd could do is put a *real* 32-bit resolution, 192 kHz sample rate version of Creative Music Synth [220] on a PCI card. But noooooooooooooooooooooo! They are too f--king lazy. Its not just Creative Technology that's responsible. Its also the fault of self-destructive customers who don't mind paying$$ for those crappy sample playback synths. F--k those customers
as well. Masochistic perverts! I don't care if those customers destroy
themselves. Though, I sure as f--k don't want them destroying me! Such
customers should eat their own stinky diarrhea kakaa foam. If you feed
a scum, then you're just as filthy as that scum and I sincerely hope
you suffer just as much.

I feel like torching the chips of sample playback synths with
oxyacetylene flames to distort their audio output.

Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth.

Its those sample playback synths that are crap.

as a good thing often referring to them as 'wavetables'. These sick
marketers call sample playback synthesis 'realistic sounding'.

Sample playbacks synths are nothing more than the sound of a stinky
fart emitted from a human colon.

I've been looking hard for true FM synths. No luck. Most PCI cards
have OPL emulation. I hate FM emulation. FM emulation -- much like any
sample playback synthesis -- is to the ear what human kakaa is to the
nose.

I want *real* FM synthesis not some stinky trashy out-of-a-human-
behind emulation.

Those stinky-f==king marketers who refer to sample playback synthesis
as 'wavetables' deserve to be thrown into the sewer and made to eat
their own crap.

There is a world of different between sample playback synthesis and
wavetable synthesis.

If you still believe the marketer-induced myth that wavetable
synthesis and sample playback synthesis are the same thing, then
please educate yourself with the hardcore scientific facts presented

http://www.musicdsp.org/files/Wavetable-101.pdf

Wavetable synthesis is so much better than any kakaa-spitting sample
playback synth but not nearly as heavenly as *true* FM synthesis. Of
all the *true* FM synths, Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite.

If a synth is *not*:

1. *Real*

AND

2. *Digital*

AND

3. *Real-time*

AND

4. *Hardware*

then it,
STEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I try playing Creative Music Synth [220], through my so called
'karaoke voice canceller' -- which inverts the phase of one stereo
channel [right or left] and then combines it the other channel --
which results in anything identical in both the left and right
channels being removed. I get a mono of what was different in the left
and right channels.

When I play Creative Music Synth [220] audio through the voice-
canceller, it sounds more treble, sharper, brighter, warmer, and
crisper than when I don't use the voice canceller.

Any understanding, cooperation, and assistance is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

J

#### [email protected]

Jan 1, 1970
0
Please assist me with the following.
I would like to make some replicable magnetic electronic nanobots that
will search for sample playback MIDI synths in any part of the world
and attach to the digital chips of sample playback MIDI synths.

Write a letter to Marvel Comics for help in your project.

<remaining insane nonsense snipped>

N

#### notejam

Jan 1, 1970
0
Try going to www.zzounds.com and enter fm synth in the search window.
Also go to www.ebay.com and do the same.

ZZounds has 3 new fm software synths, and on ebay you can find lots of
hardware fm synths.
The old dx7 was kind of king of the old fm synths in the early days of
midi and synths.
They sounded pretty good, were used by lots of bands and on lots of
records.
The dx11 is 8 voice multi-timbral, sort of like a lil brother of the
dx7, as it had 4 operator (yamahas word for it) intead of 6 operator
synths. The dx7 is a solo instrument.

Think garage band also had a dx7 fm synth either with it, or in an add
on package.

C

#### contrex

Jan 1, 1970
0
He or she sounds from their writing like they are autistic. Possibly
high-functioning, but autistic all the same.

A

#### Afoklala

Jan 1, 1970
0
Op 14 Feb 2007 23:37:38 -0800 schreef contrex:
He or she sounds from their writing like they are autistic. Possibly
high-functioning, but autistic all the same.

Don't think so. Autistic people usually know very well what they're on
about. They know everything there is to know about their preferred subject
(they usually have one). This person just talks gibberish - nanorobots to
find files on the internet? That's rubbish. No autistic would come up with
such an idea. Either because they're not interested in related subjects, or
because they are and know all about it.
(BTW, I'm a father of an autistic 17yo)
--
Jan Willem from Odijk, Netherlands

Listen to my music on http://www.xs4all.nl/~dormoljw/gbcomponist.html

e-mail in From-field is wrong, real e-mail is:
jw point van point dormolen on xs4all point nl
(change point into dot, on into at)

And then there's this:
Forsooth, avoid archaisms.

W

Jan 1, 1970
0
B

#### Bob Myers

Jan 1, 1970
0
to be SLIGHTLY in touch with reality. You may want to try again
with this one.

Bob M.

B

#### Bob

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi:

Please assist me with the following.

I would like to make some replicable magnetic electronic nanobots that
will search for sample playback MIDI synths in any part of the world
and attach to the digital chips of sample playback MIDI synths. These
nanobots should contain magnetic receivers that will extract any
random environmental magnetic audio signals from 2 kHz to 50 kHz
[excluding spikes, square-waves, white noise, brown noise, pink noise
and bass sounds]. The nanobots then amplify those signals to the point
where they would significantly interfere with -- and cause inductive
crosstalk in -- the audio signals in the digital electronic chips of
the sample playback MIDI synths. This will cause sample playback MIDI
synths to be full of annoying -- and perhaps even frightening --
auditory disruptions from environmental magnetic interference.

That way all companies will be forced to make *real* synths and the
listeners will be forced to adapt to the excellent audio quality of
*real* synths. For those who miss their stinky human kakaa foam of
sample playback synths, well, f--k them!

Note: The magnetic signals that interfere with those digital chips
should be purely-analog. I just love it when purely-analog magnetic
signals cause significant disruptions in purely-digital chip-based
parts of electronic devices that I don't like. Sample playback MIDI
synths are an example of digital electronic devices that I don't like
so I want to victimize them in this manner -- i.e. via magnetic
inteferences.

On the Creative website -- forums.creative.com -- I am known as
"CMS220"

In the above link, is where I take revenge against the following:

1. Creative Technology for no longer making or upgrading Creative
Music Synth [220]

2. Customers who like -- or don't mind -- sample playback MIDI synths

3. Customers who dislike -- or don't care for - Creative Music Synth
[220]

On the Creative Technology site, I first asked my questions politely
but no one answered me. I then got frustrated and vented all my anger.
Now those jerks know how I feel.

I lost control of my temper and used very bad words. As a result, any
computer with my home IP address cannot access the Creative forums.
Also, if I login under the name "CMS220" in any part of the world, the
because I logged in under CMS220. They've got some auto-ban type of
feature, it seems.

It started off like this. I asked in the Creative Technologyhttp://forums..creative.comas politely as I could. I waited a couple
of weeks. No response. I asked again as politely as I could, waited
another few weeks. Again no answers. I tried on the third and last
time as politely as I could. AGAIN, no answers!!!

I then got impatient and aggressive. I started venting my anger in
those forums. I used bad words. As a result, they've permanently
banned my IP and I can no longer access their forums. What a buncha
jerks. Yes, I did get carried away with the foul language but hey, can
ya blame me?

So I can no longer sign-in under CMS220. I got a new username "SB16-
ISA-FM" and logged in from another network outside my house. I started
venting my anger again using colorful language. One of the Creative
Technology companymen then sent me a warning note, in which he/she/it
threatened to contact my ISP and shut-down my internet connection.
What those fools don't realize is that I can log in under any name
from any network that I am given access to. It doesn't have to be from
my house.

Maybe if Creative Technology weren't made up of such jerks, then I
wouldn't have started spamming their forums in the 1st place. So its
not my fault.

I would like a real Creative Music Synth [220]. Doesn't have to be in
a sound card. It could be a keyboard, a MIDI box or in any other form.

Sadly, its not gonna happen because the mechanism by which Creative
Music Synth [220] is kept classified as top-secret by Creative
Technology Ltd. CMS220 is no longer made yet the sick @$$company still keeps the working of CMS220 a secret. Creative Technology is a stubborn piece of crap. F--k those stingy secretive bastards. I hate sick sample playback MIDI synths. I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non- emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there. FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa SB Live stinks like human kakaa. It has no real music synthesis. Its all kakaa-like emulation. SB16 PCI has the disadvantages of SB16 ISA [e.g. limitation to 16-bit resolution] without the advantages [e.g. *real* FM synthesis]. All SB16 PCIs should be burned in oxyacetylene flames. AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'. I hate it though because it is emulation. The Avance sound card has 'Avance FM synth', but its also a real stinker as it isn't a real synth. The evil PCI loves to inflict pain on other types of slot -- ISA being the unfortunate victim. PCI cards don't contain real FM synths. Anything kind of 'OPL' a PCI would have, would be emulation. The only 'OPL' any PCI cards have is OPL emulation. Emulation stinks like human diarrhea kakaa foam. I don't understand why a PCI card cannot contain a real FM synth like Creative Music Synth [220]. Is there a technical barrier to this? I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness, warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous -- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation. Creative Music Synth [220] = SB16 ISA's FM synth = my favorite MIDI synth. I don't care for other MIDI synths. Creative Music Synth [220] is: 1. Real and 2. Digital and 3. Hardware and 4. Real-time All other FM synths are okay. Wavetables are also good. But I don't care for them. Here are my ratings for *soundcard* MIDI synths in the order from best to worst: 1. Creative Music Synth [220] 2. All digital hardware FM synths other than Creative Music Synth [220] 3. Wavetables, non-FM digital synths, analog [non-digital] synths 4. Sample playback synths Sample playback synths are the worst. Sample playback synths STEEEENK!!!! Sample playback MIDI synths are the worst audio equipment ever. They are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy, irritating, farty, hissy, terrifying, disgusting, and annoying. I like the audio quality of Creative Music Synth [220]. It sounds so warm, fresh, bright, rejuvenating, lively and effervescent. The only thing about Creative Technology that I like is their Creative Music Synth [220]. Other than that, they are a piece of kakaa. Creative Technology is one f--king piece of crap that provides sh--ty customer service. Their tech support is so limited. Creative Technology used to be such a great company 13 years ago. Now there are nothing but stinky-diarrhea-kakaa-foam-of-humans. I've asked them about Creative Music Synth [220] -- through a variety of means, including but not limited to phone, fax, and their online tech support -- only to be totally-ignored. I asked them about this for the past 5 years. Never got a decent answer. In addition, most of their online tech support is pre-written garbage. Creative Technology also uses such f--ked up sickening disgusting sample playback synths in their PCI cards. I wish that a gang of persons who support Creative Music Synth [220] would attack Creative Technology and force them to make hardware versions of Creative Music Synth [220] -- in PCI cards that are compatible with PCI slots and Windows XP -- upgraded from 16-bit to 32- bit and from 44.1 KHz to 192 KHz. And from there, keep on upgrading! When XP and PCI are obsolete then Creative Technology should be forced to make even newer hardware versions of CMS220 -- with even wider bit- resolutions and higher sample-rates -- that are compatible with the newer hardwares and softwares that will exist in that future time. If Creative Technology refuses, I hope the CMS220-advocating gang ties up the people who make up that company and torturously forces them to repeatedly listen to sample playback MIDI synths and emulation until those Creative personnel are annoyed with burning headaches and are deathly desperate for an escape. Only then will the people of Creative Technology do the right thing -- make upgraded versions of Creative Music Synth [220]. A rich spoiled-rotten company like Creative deserves to be heinously hijacked and forced to do their duties. The least Creative Technology Ltd could do is put a *real* 32-bit resolution, 192 kHz sample rate version of Creative Music Synth [220] on a PCI card. But noooooooooooooooooooooo! They are too f--king lazy. Its not just Creative Technology that's responsible. Its also the fault of self-destructive customers who don't mind paying$$ for those crappy sample playback synths. F--k those customers
as well. Masochistic perverts! I don't care if those customers destroy
themselves. Though, I sure as f--k don't want them destroying me! Such
customers should eat their own stinky diarrhea kakaa foam. If you feed
a scum, then you're just as filthy as that scum and I sincerely hope
you suffer just as much.

I feel like torching the chips of sample playback synths with
oxyacetylene flames to distort their audio output.

Creative Music Synth [220] is my favorite MIDI synth.

Its those sample playback synths that are crap.

as a good thing often referring to them as 'wavetables'. These sick
marketers call sample playback synthesis 'realistic sounding'.

Sample playbacks synths are nothing more than the sound of a stinky
fart emitted from a human colon.

I've been looking hard for true FM synths. No luck. Most PCI cards
have OPL emulation. I hate FM emulation. FM emulation -- much like any
sample playback synthesis -- is to the ear what human kakaa is to the ...

R

Jan 1, 1970
0
He's a troll. He has been doing this for years.

Whats trollish about wanting to take revenge against sample playback
MIDI synths?

I want to punish the purely-digital chip-based parts of sample
playback MIDI synths by terrifying their producers and consumers with

I want to force companies and customers to be unwilling to make or use
any sample playback MIDI synths via the above method.

W

#### Wes

Jan 1, 1970
0
I hate to break it to you, but your beloved SoundBlaster is a purely digital
chip based world. To use the device you fantasize about will surely destroy
your SoundBlaster along with all the evil sample playback instruments. It
will be collateral damage.

Wes Taggart
Analogics
http://www.analogics.org

R

Jan 1, 1970
0
To use the device you fantasize about will surely destroy
your SoundBlaster along with all the evil sample playback instruments.

Nope. My magnetic device can precisely tell the difference between
Creative Music Synth [220] and a sample playback MIDI synth. It steers
clear of the former while polluting the latter with terrifying
magnetic disruptions.

I'll see to it that revenge is mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

W

#### Wes

Jan 1, 1970
0
Since you are asking how to create such a device, I find it fascinating that
you already know this to be true.

Wes

To use the device you fantasize about will surely destroy
your SoundBlaster along with all the evil sample playback instruments.

Nope. My magnetic device can precisely tell the difference between
Creative Music Synth [220] and a sample playback MIDI synth. It steers
clear of the former while polluting the latter with terrifying
magnetic disruptions.

I'll see to it that revenge is mine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

M

#### Mr Pyburn

Jan 1, 1970
0
hmm. Curiously i decided to Google "Creative Music Synth [220]"
Yes, oh what a shock - lots of forum posts of you harking on about
something which at first I thought was legitimate and interesting.
However, it would appear that I've wasted my time (yes, am aware of
the self-referencial irony, due to me wasting time typing this!)

Where have all the interesting posts gone?
Oh look - here they are... hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of
people who actually DO have something constructive to say.

Radium - why don't you write articles for Fortean Times or the
National Enquirer?

MrP

M

#### Michael A. Terrell

Jan 1, 1970
0
Mr said:
hmm. Curiously i decided to Google "Creative Music Synth [220]"
Yes, oh what a shock - lots of forum posts of you harking on about
something which at first I thought was legitimate and interesting.
However, it would appear that I've wasted my time (yes, am aware of
the self-referencial irony, due to me wasting time typing this!)

Where have all the interesting posts gone?
Oh look - here they are... hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of
people who actually DO have something constructive to say.

Radium - why don't you write articles for Fortean Times or the
National Enquirer?

MrP

He should write the science column for the "Weekly World News"

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

W

#### Wes

Jan 1, 1970
0
Even they wouldn't believe him.

Wes Taggart
Analogics
http://www.analogics.org/

Michael A. Terrell said:
Mr said:
hmm. Curiously i decided to Google "Creative Music Synth [220]"
Yes, oh what a shock - lots of forum posts of you harking on about
something which at first I thought was legitimate and interesting.
However, it would appear that I've wasted my time (yes, am aware of
the self-referencial irony, due to me wasting time typing this!)

Where have all the interesting posts gone?
Oh look - here they are... hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of
people who actually DO have something constructive to say.

Radium - why don't you write articles for Fortean Times or the
National Enquirer?

MrP

He should write the science column for the "Weekly World News"

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

M

#### Michael A. Terrell

Jan 1, 1970
0
Wes said:
Even they wouldn't believe him.

That makes him a perfect fit for their tabloid.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

H

#### Homer J Simpson

Jan 1, 1970
0
Radium - why don't you write articles for Fortean Times or the
National Enquirer?

Weekly World News - and if you have pictures of Batboy (the love child of
Marilyn and Elvis who now live in a trailer park and run the local Piggly
Wiggly) do include them.

--
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..

B

#### Bob Myers

Jan 1, 1970
0
He should write the science column for the "Weekly World News"

All of the above publications have rejected his submissions on
the grounds of their straining credulity just TOO far...

Bob M.

G

#### Grayvyard Mushruumz

Jan 1, 1970
0
(Begged to know how to make cheap hardware even worse with nanobots.)
(...)
I just wish the audio communities would revert back to real, non-
emulated SB16 FM synthesis and upgrade from there.

Wasn't that Yamaha's OPL? Fine for many things, but not as flexible as
PCM.
FM emulation [or any audio emulation for that matter] is sample
playback. Sample playback synth = human kakaa

It works. It's easy to do. It's hard to make it good, but when it's
good, as when
someone spends thirty hours on one track, then it's very good. If I
wer to complain
about SBs, it's simply that the one I used briefly, to record my 1-bit
PC speaker, no less, was very noisy.

(...)
SB16 PCI has the disadvantages of SB16 ISA [e.g. limitation to 16-bit
resolution] without the advantages [e.g. *real* FM synthesis]. All
SB16 PCIs should be burned in oxyacetylene flames.

When last I checked, it was very difficult to make a noticable
improvement on 16bit/44.1k sound -- IF you hav low electrical and
acoustic noise. The low order three to five bits of 16bit sound should
sometimes be ignored, but I prefer to use a noise profiler/filter.
AFAIK, some PCI cards contain something called 'Yamaha FM synth'.

Last time I read anything about it, Yamaha wrote it, and Creative Labs
emulated it.

(...)
I can easily tell the difference between the freshness, brightness,
warmth, and liveliness of a *real* synth from the stale, cacophonous
-- or rather KAKAA-FOAMous -- fart of emulation.

Sine waves are stale. Square waves are stale. I dress them up.

(...)
Sample playback MIDI synths are the worst audio equipment ever. They
are stinky, tickly, itchy, creepy, irritating, farty, hissy,
terrifying, disgusting, and annoying.

That's what makes them fun. The catch for me, since I use a script
synth,
is how to keep the transforms and harmonics interesting without making
them
annoying.

(...)
192 KHz. And from there, keep on upgrading!

If it's done well, then 44.1k/16bit files are ample. If it's good
stuff, then it'll come through a phone. Whataya want with 192khz? Bat
chirps for echolocation? Brownian noise? Human hearing peaks at birth
around 20khz (22.05khz can be represented at a 44.1khz sampling rate).
An adult will hav trouble with pitches above 15khz, and the piano ends
When XP and PCI are obsolete then Creative Technology should be forced
to make even newer hardware versions of CMS220 -- with even wider bit-
resolutions and higher sample-rates -- that are compatible with the
newer hardwares and softwares that will exist in that future time.

The nutty thing is that this has already been done by Sony. They hav a
DVD format supporting something like 2.88 MHz. With the proper antenna
and amplifier, you could record most of the AM band up to 1400Khz
_simultaneously_ (and rebroadcast it later, at a lower wattage). In
everyday use, that would be electrical noise.
(...)
I feel like torching the chips of sample playback synths with
oxyacetylene flames to distort their audio output.
(...)
Reportedly, a microwave oven will vaporize them (more likely, turn
them into sand with a lot of sparking). Search for "microwave
incense".

Okay, so in sum, Radium seems to think samples are typically garbage,
and FM synthesis is hard to use. But he can't seem to make up his mind
whether Creative
Labs does a good job of either.
_______
<a href="http://www.mynumo.com/ringtones/preview.php?
Cat_Id=1&Cn_Id=3192"

G

#### Grayvyard Mushruumz

Jan 1, 1970
0
Reverb is distortion, but I like it, and I just uploaded something
with a much more perverse multi-tap. Harmony is distortion, too.
It can be difficult to make out words through it, but it sounds good.
_______
<a href="http://www.mynumo.com/ringtones/preview.php?
Cat_Id=1&Cn_Id=3192"

Replies
1
Views
710
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
528
Replies
1
Views
635