roltex_rohit123
- Oct 12, 2009
- 92
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 92
At some point you have to realise that the original circuit was poorly designed and that there may be more than just this one aspect.
Given your admitted lack of experience in this area, it may be better to find a "de-sulphator" that has been designed properly and to give that a trial.
As evidence of what poor design does, I point you here. Note the effect of poor design on their research. (Also note that this isn't/wasn't research -- they were giving people experience of how research is conducted in kind of a "fun" way).
One such circuit was published in "Silicon Chip" magazine in July 2005. Note that they specifically disclaim that the circuit "works as advertised".but at least it has the advantage of being overseen by their designers who will not make the same mistakes that non-designers might.
If you are sufficiently interested you can purchase single copies of their magazines for on-line viewing. Go to http://www.siliconchip.com.au
I have my copy open here before me. It ticks a lot more boxes than most of the designs I've seen on the web.
yes Steve I've already gone through the desulfator page. i dont have a siliconchip magazine but on thing i would like to tell you. if someone fails in developing some technology then others must work hard to develop it. the page said that they didnt have time to investigate. moreover they too used the same 555 chip. so if we have time and money we can definitely carry on. if you have some design in mind then you may help me indirectly, this way i will also develop my knowledge in electronics. if my current design is not at all going to work then i dont mind using any other ic or even a microcontroller which requires programming.