Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Lookinf for options for an Absolute Magnitude" or precision rectifier circuit.

J

Jim Thompson

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim Thompson said:
wrote:

[snip]

Why don't you plonk this and run- you little tutu wearing
flake...

Sheeesh! What have we come to? Even Fred has to resort to an alias
to get read.

FuFred ;-)
...Jim Thompson

Gee, was that Freddy?

It did look like him! Or it rather sounded like him. He hasn't
changed at all.

I will be talking to the AD Engineer responsible for the product
on Monday to advise him and find if there is another explanation
for the problem. He wasn't in on Friday.

I do not work in a vacuum, and communicate with the responsible
parties at all venders I use.

By the way, many of the product people know me.
We have a beer at the various shows.
(I know, Wine would be better.)

One thing I failed to mention... you might want to AC-gain-up your
signal before rectification... gets you out of offset problems, and
can allow cheaper OpAmps.

...Jim Thompson
 
F

Fred Bloggs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Clarence_A said:
I will be talking to the AD Engineer responsible for the product
on Monday to advise him and find if there is another explanation
for the problem. He wasn't in on Friday.

What a F_CKING moron and pest!- I am so sure they look forward to
fielding queries from you- with your ignorance, broken English, and
overall moronic demeanor and mindset.

I do not work in a vacuum, and communicate with the responsible
parties at all venders I use.

Oh my goodness- what a chatterbox you are!
By the way, many of the product people know me.
We have a beer at the various shows.
(I know, Wine would be better.)

Know to avoid you, is what you mean....
 
C

Clarence_A

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim Thompson said:
[snip]

One thing I failed to mention... you might want to AC-gain-up your
signal before rectification... gets you out of offset problems, and
can allow cheaper OpAmps.
...Jim Thompson

The customer seems to want to know if the unit will work over a
very wide range. My nominal input (threshold) is 134 mV so I was
considering a gain of about 4 up front. They are not likely to
need the maximum of .6VRMS since that is more current than the
wiring will safely support.

This is another item on the list to discuss with the customer.
When I signed on to this project they'd already had a preliminary
design review, now they say they have to get permission to make
significant changes. I thought that until the 'critical design
review' the project was a work in progress.

I will start to build a first article in the coming week. (Brass
Board.)

I would prefer a different amp, for no other reason than I am more
familiar with its performance. However Cost is not an issue.
This unit sells for an increasable mark-up!

The good news is that they know they need this review and trust me
to get the unit to qualification test, since I have done many of
this type of project.
 
R

richard mullens

Jan 1, 1970
0
Clarence_A said:
Strange statement. Fred never has anything constructive to say to me, or about me if he can fine someone to reply, since I never see his postings!

Do you not see the difference between constructive comment and deliberate nonsense? Remember that Fred Bloggs has nothing at stake! I am the only one doing the design work on the electronics of a critical piece of aircraft safety equipment. The design I was told to "Modify, is ON aircraft now! Scares me, and I wasn't the one who did the deed!

All I can say is that you must have done/said something to upset him. Because he is not like this with everyone. I recollect
that you wrote in reply to a message I posted "<snipped stupid remarks>". Perhaps you did something like that to him too? If
you call people stupid, sometimes they will take offence and return the favour.

It is best to respect other people's points of view - you do not necessarily have to hold them too. Remember that they may hold
them just as sincerely as you.
 
C

Clarence_A

Jan 1, 1970
0
say that any one's person's view is any more legitimate than an
other's. In the end, it all comes down to evidence or in some
cases the lack of it !say to me, or about me if he can fine someone to reply, since I
never see his postings!deliberate nonsense? Remember that Fred Bloggs has nothing at
stake! I am the only one doing the design work on the electronics
of a critical piece of aircraft safety equipment. The design I
was told to "Modify, is ON aircraft now! Scares me, and I wasn't
the one who did the deed!
All I can say is that you must have done/said something to upset
him. Because he is not like this with everyone. I recollect
that you wrote in reply to a message I posted "<snipped stupid
remarks>". Perhaps you did something like that to him too? If
you call people stupid, sometimes they will take offence and return the favour.

It is best to respect other people's points of view - you do not
necessarily have to hold them too. Remember that they may hold
them just as sincerely as you.


You are now dealing with something you have no knowledge of.
FB started this by use of foul language, name calling, and calling
me stupid.
You are clearly unaware of what you as wading into.
You should be talking to Fred!

However I would note: pot / Kettle -- Black!
Your engaging in the same behavior you criticize!

Remember HE is the one who attacked me,
not that he has limited himself to me,
he is not inclined to be polite or extend respect.
He is therefore not deserving of respect.
You should choose your allies with more care!
He is NOT your friend.
Or are you another clone of FB?
He has so many it is hard to keep track.
 
J

Jim Thompson

Jan 1, 1970
0
say that any one's person's view is any more legitimate than an
other's. In the end, it all comes down to evidence or in some
cases the lack of it !
say to me, or about me if he can fine someone to reply, since I
never see his postings!
deliberate nonsense? Remember that Fred Bloggs has nothing at
stake! I am the only one doing the design work on the electronics
of a critical piece of aircraft safety equipment. The design I
was told to "Modify, is ON aircraft now! Scares me, and I wasn't
the one who did the deed!
him. Because he is not like this with everyone. I recollect
remarks>". Perhaps you did something like that to him too? If
necessarily have to hold them too. Remember that they may hold


You are now dealing with something you have no knowledge of.
FB started this by use of foul language, name calling, and calling
me stupid.
You are clearly unaware of what you as wading into.
You should be talking to Fred!

However I would note: pot / Kettle -- Black!
Your engaging in the same behavior you criticize!

Remember HE is the one who attacked me,
not that he has limited himself to me,
he is not inclined to be polite or extend respect.
He is therefore not deserving of respect.
You should choose your allies with more care!
He is NOT your friend.
Or are you another clone of FB?
He has so many it is hard to keep track.

I plonked Mullens ages ago. Didn't you notice the "ntlworld"... he's
another Bemelman-style cretin.

...Jim Thompson
 
J

John Woodgate

Jan 1, 1970
0
I read in sci.electronics.design that richard mullens <mullensdeletethis
@ntlworld.com> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about
'Lookinf for options for an Absolute Magnitude" or precision rectifier
circuit.', on Mon, 7 Feb 2005:
All I can say is that you must have done/said something to upset him.

It takes very little to do that. Practically nothing.
Because he is not like this with everyone.

He is with nearly everyone. Your turn will come.

But he does put out very good designs, and very quickly, too.
 
R

Rich The Newsgropup Wacko

Jan 1, 1970
0
I read in sci.electronics.design that martin griffith
[email protected]>) about 'Lookinf for options for an Absolute Magnitude" or
precision rectifier circuit.', on Sun, 6 Feb 2005:
I said I DIDN'T steal it. Maybe YOU should go into politics or
religion.(;-)

You said he wouldn't _let_ you steal it! This immediately sounds
suspicious, like you _would_ have. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich

I also fixed the subject line - "Lookinf" makes my eyes hurt. %-[
 
K

keith

Jan 1, 1970
0
[snip]
Why don't you plonk this and run- you little tutu wearing flake...

Sheeesh! What have we come to? Even Fred has to resort to an alias
to get read.

FuFred ;-)

FauxPhred? Or maybe Fox(news)Fred? (oh, I can't wait for the spew!)
 
Top