I am sorry that you see it that way cause i wasn't offensive nor expressing superiority in any way, i am grateful for the help of the forum members, they have all been polite and helpful in some way.
I used the term "magic" only to describe the common disbelief toward overunity devices. Ironically, it is not only possible but
very simple to obtain energy with no energy input apart from the underlying energy field permeating all space everywhere. There are MANY ways to do this, with moving parts or solid state. This is not "non sequitur" nor "woo woo science" but the REAL science, of which, what you call "science" is but small, very limited part.
This is beyond the scope of this thread, but i'll give you a simple mechanical example. You sure heard of Newton's 3 laws. But rare know there is a 4th law describing conversion of assymterical centrifugal force into linear acceleration. This phenomena has been known since 19th century, i only defined it as a law and termed it 4th law of motion cause it is in a way, an extension of Newton's 3 laws. It states:
"Asymmetrical centrifugal force of unbalanced masses converts into linear acceleration of the system."
It means that unbalanced mass oscillating within 180° or less, or spinning 360° with varying speed, accelerates the whole system unidirectionally without interacting with any outside medium apart for the space itself.
In other words, if you were floating in space (or sitting on an office chair, a small boat or ice..) and you swing your arms forward (in opposite directions to cancel the back-torque), you would accelerate forward as if someone pushed you from behind. So simple and self-evident, yet still considered "impossible". This also makes the death of Matt Kowalski from Gravity very ironic.
This is possible due to the fact rotational reference frames are non-inertial and in them virtual forces act - centrifugal force. In other words, virtual forces do not comply to “laws” of action and reaction in linear sense,
neither to conservation of momentum and energy (thermodynamics).
So, there are no limitations in nature except those man imposes upon himself by ignorance or false belief. But this is getting out of the subject.
Now you are being offensive.
And you don't know the background of people here.
Also, magic is performed by either misdirection, sleight of hand, or with hidden information or devices. If you intend to play magic tricks with us here then you're not going to get a lot of useful help but you will pots a lot of people off.
And unless your experience is with vacuum tubes, your statement is bordering on a non-sequitor.
People are trying to help you. I would recommend you lose the "I am so superior" attitude and help us help you by explaining WHAT it is you're trying to do.
We frequently find that an attitude like yours is held by people whose threads end up in the woo woo science section.
Even if I were to take you at your word that you are experienced with electronics but not with semiconductors, I would still have to tell you that the is a lot about MOSFETs that we haven't discussed yet. Some of those things are not obvious and some of those things could mean the difference between a functioning circuit and a smoke emitter.
You may be able to get around trying is what you are doing by defining the characteristics of the circuit completely, but it is far easier to simply say what you're doing.
If it is so secret you can't tell us, then you would be better off hiring somebody competent and getting them to sign a non disclosure agreement.