D
David Chapman
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
redbelly said:Hi Bob,
I'm having some trouble buying in to your explanation. If the eye
sends info in discrete blocks, does it transmit them with such
regularity that a strobe effect is even possible? And, would you know
at what rep rate an average person's eyes has?
I would have expected to have heard of this effect before, which is the
But Miller accounted the full-turn effect =E2=80=93 maybe in his
own way, and you account the full-turn effect with an outward
elegance. But Miller also selected the systematic error, but on
the other you introduced the error of the first turn is
subtracted from the data of first turn contained errors and
masking effects the same as others.
Subtracting, you on one hand as if selected the systematic
error, but on the other you introduced the error of the first
turn into the data for markers 180 degrees apart.
This gives 8 , and 8 independent of differences in ), shown in
Fig. 10 >>, you proceed from the idea that Miller had to obtain
ideal . Factually such symmetry is basically impossible, the
more that the degrees of turn have been measured not with the
accuracy you would need.