Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Nuclear EMP

T

The Alien

Jan 1, 1970
0
Any new ideas in protecting electronics from EMP besides layering in
newspaper and aluminum foil?


Or dare I say, using data from 1960?

I'm looking for a way to protect modern electronics from EMP. Thanks
in advance.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
 
R

Robert Baer

Jan 1, 1970
0
The said:
Any new ideas in protecting electronics from EMP besides layering in
newspaper and aluminum foil?


Or dare I say, using data from 1960?

I'm looking for a way to protect modern electronics from EMP. Thanks
in advance.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
"layering" with newspaper and aluminum foil will not work, unless you
use tomorrow's edition of the New York times and Genuine, Certified
Reynolds(TM) brand of aluminum foil.
NOTE: it is an absolute *must* that you have tomorrow's edition -
meaning the edition that is available only the day after today, with no
regard to the fact that it is always today.
NOTE: it is also an absolute *must* that you have fully and complete
certification of the aluminum foil in your possession at all times, and
that the certification be notarized by every notary in the US - else the
foil is no good.
 
N

no_one

Jan 1, 1970
0
My god man! Must you give up the deepest secrets of the US to just ANY NG
reader?


Robert Baer said:
The said:
Any new ideas in protecting electronics from EMP besides layering in
newspaper and aluminum foil?


Or dare I say, using data from 1960?

I'm looking for a way to protect modern electronics from EMP. Thanks
in advance.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
"layering" with newspaper and aluminum foil will not work, unless you
use tomorrow's edition of the New York times and Genuine, Certified
Reynolds(TM) brand of aluminum foil.
NOTE: it is an absolute *must* that you have tomorrow's edition -
meaning the edition that is available only the day after today, with no
regard to the fact that it is always today.
NOTE: it is also an absolute *must* that you have fully and complete
certification of the aluminum foil in your possession at all times, and
that the certification be notarized by every notary in the US - else the
foil is no good.
 
W

west

Jan 1, 1970
0
Yea ... Go back to vacuum tubes.

west


no_one said:
My god man! Must you give up the deepest secrets of the US to just ANY NG
reader?


Robert Baer said:
The said:
Any new ideas in protecting electronics from EMP besides layering in
newspaper and aluminum foil?


Or dare I say, using data from 1960?

I'm looking for a way to protect modern electronics from EMP. Thanks
in advance.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
"layering" with newspaper and aluminum foil will not work, unless you
use tomorrow's edition of the New York times and Genuine, Certified
Reynolds(TM) brand of aluminum foil.
NOTE: it is an absolute *must* that you have tomorrow's edition -
meaning the edition that is available only the day after today, with no
regard to the fact that it is always today.
NOTE: it is also an absolute *must* that you have fully and complete
certification of the aluminum foil in your possession at all times, and
that the certification be notarized by every notary in the US - else the
foil is no good.
 
T

The Alien

Jan 1, 1970
0
X-No-archive: yes On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:12:45 GMT, Robert Baer
The said:
Any new ideas in protecting electronics from EMP besides layering in
newspaper and aluminum foil?


Or dare I say, using data from 1960?

I'm looking for a way to protect modern electronics from EMP. Thanks
in advance.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
"layering" with newspaper and aluminum foil will not work, unless you
use tomorrow's edition of the New York times and Genuine, Certified
Reynolds(TM) brand of aluminum foil.
NOTE: it is an absolute *must* that you have tomorrow's edition -
meaning the edition that is available only the day after today, with no
regard to the fact that it is always today.
NOTE: it is also an absolute *must* that you have fully and complete
certification of the aluminum foil in your possession at all times, and
that the certification be notarized by every notary in the US - else the
foil is no good.

I forgot to mention the aluminum foil helmet.... can't make 'em out of
tin foil anymore, stores only sell aluminum!

;)


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
 
T

The Alien

Jan 1, 1970
0
X-No-archive: yes On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 03:44:17 GMT, "west"
Yea ... Go back to vacuum tubes.

west


no_one said:
My god man! Must you give up the deepest secrets of the US to just ANY NG
reader?


Robert Baer said:
The Alien wrote:

Any new ideas in protecting electronics from EMP besides layering in
newspaper and aluminum foil?


Or dare I say, using data from 1960?

I'm looking for a way to protect modern electronics from EMP. Thanks
in advance.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
"layering" with newspaper and aluminum foil will not work, unless you
use tomorrow's edition of the New York times and Genuine, Certified
Reynolds(TM) brand of aluminum foil.
NOTE: it is an absolute *must* that you have tomorrow's edition -
meaning the edition that is available only the day after today, with no
regard to the fact that it is always today.
NOTE: it is also an absolute *must* that you have fully and complete
certification of the aluminum foil in your possession at all times, and
that the certification be notarized by every notary in the US - else the
foil is no good.
On a more serious note, I do have a tube receiver. Just getting more
and more difficult finding 22 volt batteries...(at least for me it is
anyway).


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
 
R

Robert Baer

Jan 1, 1970
0
The said:
X-No-archive: yes On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:12:45 GMT, Robert Baer
The Alien wrote:

Any new ideas in protecting electronics from EMP besides layering in
newspaper and aluminum foil?


Or dare I say, using data from 1960?

I'm looking for a way to protect modern electronics from EMP. Thanks
in advance.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.

"layering" with newspaper and aluminum foil will not work, unless you
use tomorrow's edition of the New York times and Genuine, Certified
Reynolds(TM) brand of aluminum foil.
NOTE: it is an absolute *must* that you have tomorrow's edition -
meaning the edition that is available only the day after today, with no
regard to the fact that it is always today.
NOTE: it is also an absolute *must* that you have fully and complete
certification of the aluminum foil in your possession at all times, and
that the certification be notarized by every notary in the US - else the
foil is no good.


I forgot to mention the aluminum foil helmet.... can't make 'em out of
tin foil anymore, stores only sell aluminum!

;)


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
Excellent point!
Engineered by the Invaders...
 
R

Robert Baer

Jan 1, 1970
0
The said:
Yea ... Go back to vacuum tubes.

west


My god man! Must you give up the deepest secrets of the US to just ANY NG
reader?



The Alien wrote:


Any new ideas in protecting electronics from EMP besides layering in
newspaper and aluminum foil?


Or dare I say, using data from 1960?

I'm looking for a way to protect modern electronics from EMP. Thanks
in advance.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.

"layering" with newspaper and aluminum foil will not work, unless you
use tomorrow's edition of the New York times and Genuine, Certified
Reynolds(TM) brand of aluminum foil.
NOTE: it is an absolute *must* that you have tomorrow's edition -
meaning the edition that is available only the day after today, with no
regard to the fact that it is always today.
NOTE: it is also an absolute *must* that you have fully and complete
certification of the aluminum foil in your possession at all times, and
that the certification be notarized by every notary in the US - else the
foil is no good.
On a more serious note, I do have a tube receiver. Just getting more
and more difficult finding 22 volt batteries...(at least for me it is
anyway).


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
For the B supply?
Isn't that a bit low, and wasn't 45V more commonly used?
Perhaps you could cobble up something with standard 9V batteries or
from what i see in the Mouser catalog #624 pg 1532, 573-27A (12V, 0.303
dia by 1.10 high) which is the smallest of the two 12V batteries a 9V is
also there).
 
T

The Alien

Jan 1, 1970
0
X-No-archive: yes On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:10:53 GMT, Robert Baer
The said:
Yea ... Go back to vacuum tubes.

west



My god man! Must you give up the deepest secrets of the US to just ANY NG
reader?



The Alien wrote:


Any new ideas in protecting electronics from EMP besides layering in
newspaper and aluminum foil?


Or dare I say, using data from 1960?

I'm looking for a way to protect modern electronics from EMP. Thanks
in advance.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.

"layering" with newspaper and aluminum foil will not work, unless you
use tomorrow's edition of the New York times and Genuine, Certified
Reynolds(TM) brand of aluminum foil.
NOTE: it is an absolute *must* that you have tomorrow's edition -
meaning the edition that is available only the day after today, with no
regard to the fact that it is always today.
NOTE: it is also an absolute *must* that you have fully and complete
certification of the aluminum foil in your possession at all times, and
that the certification be notarized by every notary in the US - else the
foil is no good.
On a more serious note, I do have a tube receiver. Just getting more
and more difficult finding 22 volt batteries...(at least for me it is
anyway).
and after sirname.
For the B supply?
Isn't that a bit low, and wasn't 45V more commonly used?
Perhaps you could cobble up something with standard 9V batteries or
from what i see in the Mouser catalog #624 pg 1532, 573-27A (12V, 0.303
dia by 1.10 high) which is the smallest of the two 12V batteries a 9V is
also there).


My typo mistake! 12 volts.... C Cell size.


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:p[email protected][127.0.0.1]"></A>
mailto:p[email protected]
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.
 
M

Michael A. Terrell

Jan 1, 1970
0
The said:
I forgot to mention the aluminum foil helmet.... can't make 'em out of
tin foil anymore, stores only sell aluminum!

;)


There you go! You've just found a market for all that used tin plated
steel inside scrap electronics. ;-)
 
Top