This is my on going project and I am very close to making a self runner.
No, you're not. You're very close to wasting more time and effort on a futile endeavour.
Unless your intention is to convince uneducated folks that you're onto something and that they should invest in your design so they can take a cut of the huge profits you'll be making when you're selling megawatts of electricity to the power companies. In that case, you may be onto something.
To be charitable, I'll assume that you sincerely believe that your idea will eventually fly. In this case, what you need to understand is that you're looking at the wrong number. You're looking at efficiency, instead of losses.
If your system is, say, 95% efficient, that means that its losses are 5%. Everything you do to improve the system has the effect of reducing those losses - whether they're due to friction (mechanical resistance that converts mechanical energy into heat), electrical resistance (that converts electrical energy into heat) or any other kind of loss.
When you look at it this way, it becomes obvious that (a) the closer you get to zero losses, the more effort it takes to reduce the losses by a given number of percentage points, and (b) the concept of negative losses makes no sense. Therefore you should be able to see that "overunity" is a pipe dream.
Or you could consider the facts that (a) no one has ever achieved "overunity"; some unscrupulous folks have tried to trick people into thinking that they have, but upon proper investigation, their dishonesty has always been exposed; (b) people who promote and support "overunity" attempts are either charlatans or have little scientific training and literacy; (c) the practical implications, if "overunity" was really possible, would mean that it would be deployed immediately on a huge scale and would solve all the world's energy problems. (Conspiracy theories about governments, big oil, big power etc are totally implausible, IMO.)
Join the free forum and build / test it yourself for free no strings attached.
Free, unless you count the cost of time wasted and disappointment suffered...
You're way behind the pack on this one. Many "overunity inventors" already have demo videos showing a fully operational overunity device. (The tricks they use to make them seem to work are not shown, however.)
If you think I'm just being a smart-arse, and that you'll be laughing when someone proves me wrong, then fine. If "overunity" is ever verifiably shown to be possible, you and everyone else deserves to laugh at me. You can even send me a video of you laughing at me, or laugh at me via Skype, if you want. WHEN it happens ;-)