Maker Pro
Maker Pro

PCB Footprint Question

DD234

Mar 31, 2016
1
Joined
Mar 31, 2016
Messages
1
Hi Everyone,

I am working on creating a PCB footprint based on the dimensions from the datasheet for the connector I'm using. I'm a bit confused about whether I should design the footprint using the dimensions shown in mm or the dimensions shown in inches? Which would be better to use? Is there a way to tell if the manufacturer designed the footprint using mm or inches as their unit of measure? I attached an image from the datasheet of the PCB footprint for the connector to this message.

Thanks for your help!
Dan
 

Attachments

  • footprint.jpg
    footprint.jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 67

dorke

Jun 20, 2015
2,342
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
2,342
Welcome to EP.
In inches ,
most footprints of devices are in Inches and so is this connector( 0.1" spacing).
And so are PCB wire traces widths in mils.
The manufacture gave both for convenience only.
Aren't most other devices on your board in inches?


footprint.jpg
 

AnalogKid

Jun 10, 2015
2,893
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
2,893
The pin spacings are what matter. If they are in reasonably nice, round numbers in inches, then go with that. If you have a part that is native in mm, like a metric header with pins that are 2.00 mm apart or 0.7874", go with metric. Everything about the connector body, seating plane, hold-down tabs, etc. may be important, but not as important as the pin spacing. Also, all of that other stuff frequently has more loose tolerances.

If your CAD program can handle mixing metric and English library parts in the same design, this is an even stronger reason *not* to create a metric part with English dimensions (and vice versa). My program does the conversions to 6 decimal places, something I'm sure not going to do by hand.

ak
 

garublador

Oct 14, 2014
111
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
111
My guess is the tolerance of what the board house can accomplish (and what a pick and place machine can accomplish for SMT parts) will be looser than the rounding errors between metric and English units. I agree that using the pin spacing that's "native" to the part like AnalogKid is suggesting is best, but functionally it won't make a difference.

FWIW, that part looks like it was designed using metric, so I'd go with that if I were making the part. The 0.1" and 0.05" spacings are pretty standard, which is why those metric numbers don't look even, but those conversions have essentially no rounding error so it won't matter which one you use. If you have some reason to use one over the other I'd stick with that.
 
Top