Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Picnicking under the Sewage Outflow: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

N

not i

Jan 1, 1970
0
Some crap was written about crap and some poor guy seemed to be
upset. Sorry Roy baby.
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
Who are you gonna call at Signetics for an Obsolete TLL PROM ?
No one. No One, because Signetics does not exist. You don't even know
what obsolete means. Which tells me you don't know a thing about
electronics. You also responded "Who cares about those old chips?
STOP posting them" . That is how screwed up are, carrying on your
double standards. YOU ARE WRONG! You have no problems in some
engineer Larkin posting many pdfs? of a $2,000,000.00 building in
San Francisco. But you have a problem in what I post, and when
combined back into a pdf, was smaller in datasize that Larkins posted
pdfs? How the hell can you call your self correct?

I didn't post pdf's; they were jpegs.

Why does it matter who posts what to a.b.s.e.? It's just a place to
park files that we want to share. As long as it's not thousands of
files, anybody can ignore the ones that don't interest them. Just use
the scroll bar.

Relax.

John
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
newtype wrote...

$2,000,000.00? Are you sure it was $2,000,000.00, spot-on
to nine digits? Ahem. More it likely was $2,037,402.18
give or take a few million.

$2.15M, to be exact. Cheap for 15,000 square feet.

John
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
You did not post a single schematic. THIS IS a schematic newsgroup.
So, it comes down to the FACT that you do not even know what group to
post your CRAP into.

Hey, you sound like DampMatter. He never posted schematics either.

John
 
J

Jim Thompson

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hey, you sound like DampMatter. He never posted schematics either.

John

Have you noticed that virtually ALL the complainers are
non-participants ?:)

...Jim Thompson
 
W

Winfield Hill

Jan 1, 1970
0
John Larkin wrote...
Winfield Hill wrote:

$2.15M, to be exact. Cheap for 15,000 square feet.

I sold my 42,000 sf renovated mill on the Charles River in
Newton for $1.2M, a big loss for me, nine years ago. :-(
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
Have you noticed that virtually ALL the complainers are
non-participants ?:)

...Jim Thompson


Well, sure. That's all they know how to do. It's self-reinforcing.

John
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
John Larkin wrote...

I sold my 42,000 sf renovated mill on the Charles River in
Newton for $1.2M, a big loss for me, nine years ago. :-(


Yeah, this is scairy as hell. Now we have to keep the buisiness
rolling in to pay all the bills. It's a lot easier, in many respects,
to work for someone else and let them worry about the money.

John
 
J

John Fields

Jan 1, 1970
0
Yeah, this is scairy as hell. Now we have to keep the buisiness
rolling in to pay all the bills. It's a lot easier, in many respects,
to work for someone else and let them worry about the money.
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
Picturesque, but I intend to leave my business to my employees, if I
can find any that seem able to handle it. I'd be stupid to do anything
else.

John
 
R

Roy L. Fuchs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Who are you gonna call at Signetics for an Obsolete TLL PROM ?
No one. No One, because Signetics does not exist.


You're an idiot, newturd.
 
M

Michael A. Terrell

Jan 1, 1970
0
John said:
It just seems like that to you because you've got all the
participants who make you squirm, plonked. Ignorance is bliss, no?


I used to work for Bliss. Jim remindes me a lot of him. He used to
brag about how much he'd forgotten about the business.

--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
R

Roy L. Fuchs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hey, you sound like DampMatter.

You're almost as much of an idiot as newturd.
He never posted schematics either.

There was a schematic posted last week about a motor controller, and
there were some questions.

I posted a photo of the end of a motor that had a chopper wheel on it.
wrong again, you are.
 
R

Roy L. Fuchs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Have you noticed that virtually ALL the complainers are
non-participants ?:)

...Jim Thompson


Said the idiot that "plonks" someone for writing "Hahahaha".
 
R

Roy L. Fuchs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Some crap was written about crap and some poor guy seemed to be
upset. Sorry Roy baby.

Some retard that knows absofuckinglutely nothing about Usenet felt
that top posting this garbage would mean something to someone...
anyone. Wrong again.

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post

You're an idiot. You aren't even using Outhouse Express, and you're
still an idiot.

Top posting is bad, idiot. Retarded even.
 
R

Roy L. Fuchs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Here's the archive of the creation control messages for abse
<ftp://ftp.isc.org/usenet/control/alt/alt.binaries.schematics.electronic.gz>


Here it is as text, which is how you should have posted it.

From [email protected] Tue Mar 4 16:19:43 1997
Control: newgroup alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic.ctl
Path:
news.isc.org!uunet!in2.uu.net!204.253.208.40!insync!enews.sgi.com!news.corp.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!news-out.microserve.net!news-in.microserve.net!frackit!news
From: [email protected] (Usenet News Admin)
Subject: cmsg newgroup alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Approved: News @ frackit <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 22:55:41 GMT
Organization: Data Factory Services, Harrisburg, Pa.
Lines: 39
Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:2233

For your newsgroups file:

alt.binaries.schematics.electronic Binary postings of electronic
schematics

Newsgroup: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

CHARTER: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

The purpose of this newsgroup is to create a forum for discussing,
posting, requesting and using schematics.

Postings may include, but will not be limited to:

1 Graphic Images [Any Form}
2 Request for specific or general schematics
3. Discussion of schematics posted or needed.

The group is unmoderated.

END CHARTER.


RATIONALE: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

Many people are hobbyist, and as such, they create electronic designs
that are not for profit. These people do, from time to time, create
web
and ftp sites to share electronic schematics.
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic would be the place for all people
to
uploaded/download/request/critique/and discuss schematics.

alt.binaries.schematics.electronic. would also be great because in
many
existing newsgroups people do ask for a place to get schematics often.
Specifically sci.electronics.basics has several messages per week on
that very idea.

The new hierarchy created by this creation will provide a jumping off
point for other groups that deal with schematics.



From [email protected] Fri Mar 14 19:54:05 1997
Control: newgroup alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.binaries.schematics.electronic.ctl
Path:
news.isc.org!uunet!in2.uu.net!199.94.215.18!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-xfer.mccc.edu!news-xfer.netaxs.com!news-out.microserve.net!news-in.microserve.net!frackit!news
From: [email protected] (Usenet News Admin)
Subject: cmsg newgroup alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Approved: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 02:21:41 GMT
Organization: Data Factory Services, Harrisburg, Pa.
Lines: 41
Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:2554

[BOOSTER]

For your newsgroups file:

alt.binaries.schematics.electronic Binary postings of electronic
schematics

Newsgroup: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

CHARTER: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

The purpose of this newsgroup is to create a forum for discussing,
posting, requesting and using schematics.

Postings may include, but will not be limited to:

1 Graphic Images [Any Form}
2 Request for specific or general schematics
3. Discussion of schematics posted or needed.

The group is unmoderated.

END CHARTER.


RATIONALE: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic

Many people are hobbyist, and as such, they create electronic designs
that are not for profit. These people do, from time to time, create
web
and ftp sites to share electronic schematics.
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic would be the place for all people
to
uploaded/download/request/critique/and discuss schematics.

alt.binaries.schematics.electronic. would also be great because in
many
existing newsgroups people do ask for a place to get schematics often.
Specifically sci.electronics.basics has several messages per week on
that very idea.

The new hierarchy created by this creation will provide a jumping off
point for other groups that deal with schematics.



From [email protected] Sun Jan 11 21:30:14 1998
Path:
news.isc.org!news.Stanford.EDU!agate!howland.erols.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!news-peer-east.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!Sprint!news.idt.net!enews.sgi.com!zdc!szdc!super.zippo.com!newsp.zippo.com!mediumwave
From: [email protected] (Crash Knorr)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,alt.config
Subject: Cmsg newgroup alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Control: newgroup alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 23:27:13 -0500
Organization: nada
Lines: 14
Approved: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p-566.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.4.0
Xref: news.isc.org control.newgroup:14601

For your newsgroups file:
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic Binary postings of electronic
schematics


- booster -

Potentially worthwhile newsgroup, created 4 March 1997, has some
propagation problems. Sysadmins, please add this group.
 
Top