Maker Pro
Maker Pro

"Real WMV", 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive scan image, "object data" bit-rate of 1b

R

Radium

Jan 1, 1970
0
K

Ken Maltby

Jan 1, 1970
0
Radium said:
Bob Myers wrote in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.basics/msg/0d0bbebafddcd749?hl=en&
:

Why can't a WMV file of 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive
scan image-resolution with 1-bit-per-second exist? Can't the
color-depth be compressed enough to decrease the bit-rate to
1-bit-per-second? What stopping such from taking place?

While it is good that you finally changed from "1-bit object data" to
"'object data' bit-rate of 1bps", you have had several explanations as
to why your "idea" of such a video file is not feasible. The evolution
of your posts, is somewhat revealing, and they do show a very slow
penetration of valid concepts. But you still refuse to either do the
study/research yourself or except the observations of those with more
experience in this area.

After a certain age, whining the same refrain over and
over again, gets you nowhere. (Unless you are someone's
wife.)

Luck;
Ken
 
B

Bob Myers

Jan 1, 1970
0
Radium said:
Bob Myers wrote in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.basics/msg/0d0bbebafddcd749?hl=en&
:

Why can't a WMV file of 148.50 mhz sample-rate, 1920 X 1080 progressive
scan image-resolution with 1-bit-per-second exist? Can't the
color-depth be compressed enough to decrease the bit-rate to
1-bit-per-second? What stopping such from taking place?

Like I said, go read up on some basic information theory, and
start thinking about what "1 bit per second" could actually convey.
Don't expect everyone here to do ALL your thinking for you...

Bob M.
 
K

Ken Maltby

Jan 1, 1970
0
Bob Myers said:
Like I said, go read up on some basic information theory, and
start thinking about what "1 bit per second" could actually convey.
Don't expect everyone here to do ALL your thinking for you...

Bob M.

Simple logic should have ended this a long time ago.

It would be at least 15 frames per bit, and not just any
frames, but ones that are 1920 pixels x 1080 pixels in
size.

The WMV encoder shows 15 frames per second as the
lowest setting. So 1/15th of his one bit is available for
each frame. Even if his one bit were repeated 15 times,
on playback, it would still be the same one bit of data
for each of the 15 frames.

But since no encoder (or any other program) can work
with 1/15th of a bit and no player could render a frame
of only one bit, this is just a romp through a delusional
mind.

Luck;
Ken
 
T

Tobias Bergmann

Jan 1, 1970
0
Ken said:
But since no encoder (or any other program) can work
with 1/15th of a bit and no player could render a frame
of only one bit, this is just a romp through a delusional
mind.

Never heard of the millibit?

OTOH, it might just have been the one "Switch the universe on"-bit that
generates all our existence :p

bis besser,
Tobias
 
J

Jukka Aho

Jan 1, 1970
0
Tobias said:
Never heard of the millibit?

OTOH, it might just have been the one "Switch the universe on"-bit
that generates all our existence :p

I think you're going a bit too far.
 
M

Michael A. Terrell

Jan 1, 1970
0
Tobias said:
Never heard of the millibit?

OTOH, it might just have been the one "Switch the universe on"-bit that
generates all our existence :p

bis besser,
Tobias


That was a parsec wide pluger that said, DO NOT PUSH!


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
M

Michael A. Terrell

Jan 1, 1970
0
Gene E. Bloch said:
*Now* I understand!


Remember, don't think outside the box, because there is no box. ;-)


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
Top