Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Using photonics for real-time processing.

J

JackShephard

Jan 1, 1970
0
Gee, you don't get along with anyone but Radium, do you? That speaks
volumes about your character.
I've never had any discourse with him, idiot.

I have more character in one of my toenail clippings than you do in
your entire, pathetic, EE Times, JPL hating body.
 
D

Don Bowey

Jan 1, 1970
0
Because that is not the application it is meant for, dipshit.

Exactly! And the point is, why did you bring it up? THE TOPIC being
discussed was optical Memory when you barged into the near end of the string
raving about irrelevant items like MRAM and SONET.
 
D

Don Bowey

Jan 1, 1970
0
You lost. Get over it.

The technology comes from JPL.


This is yet another attempt by you to shift the topic to a totally irreleant
point. And the poor quality of your post leaves me wondering; what
technology comes from JPL?
 
D

Don Bowey

Jan 1, 1970
0
Gee, you don't get along with anyone but Radium, do you? That speaks
volumes about your character.

Not fair to Radium. He appears to not be an electronics whiz, but he does
seem to be a nice kid.
 
D

Don Bowey

Jan 1, 1970
0
I've never had any discourse with him, idiot.

I have more character in one of my toenail clippings than you do in
your entire, pathetic, EE Times, JPL hating body.

There you go again moving the subject and casting aspersions not in
evidence.

More and more you appear to be a troll.
 
M

MooseFET

Jan 1, 1970
0
On May 27, 2:50 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <[email protected]>
wrote:
[... JPL ...]
Yawn. Look at the thousands of ideas they have pumped out since
their inception that lead nowhere. It is a research center, ad their
job is to test theories. Some work, and some don't. Think "Tax funded
Edison Labs".


This is also true of the other national labs. JPL has a better
success rate than Edison. They generally don't attack a problem with
more brains and less brute force than Edison did. Still, however, if
a majority of the things they looked into panned out, they wouldn't be
doing their jobs.
 
M

Michael A. Terrell

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don said:
Not fair to Radium. He appears to not be an electronics whiz, but he does
seem to be a nice kid.


You do know that "Jack" is "Dark Matter", don't you?


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
I have more character in one of my toenail clippings than you do in
your entire, pathetic, EE Times, JPL hating body.

Doctors can take care of that now toenail problem these days.
 
D

Don Bowey

Jan 1, 1970
0
^^^^^^

You do know that "Jack" is "Dark Matter", don't you?

I began to suspect it a couple days ago, but I was waiting for some of the
more telling indicators. He is showing some restraint that his DorkMatter
persona couldn't hold back.
 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
I began to suspect it a couple days ago, but I was waiting for some of the
more telling indicators. He is showing some restraint that his DorkMatter
persona couldn't hold back.

Dimmy always starts out that way when he shifts nyms. A few days
later his Dimbulb behavior oozes out from all orifices.
 
J

JackShephard

Jan 1, 1970
0
Exactly! And the point is, why did you bring it up? THE TOPIC being
discussed was optical Memory when you barged into the near end of the string
raving about irrelevant items like MRAM and SONET.


No, I did not. The Terrell idiot "bragged", as you call it, about bubble
memory, and even posted some lame joke RAM link. AFTER his remarks about
bubble memory, I posted a remark about what IS the modern day equivalent
of it, which is MRAM.

The remarks about OC768 were related to optical memory, because the
application FOR optical memory will primarily be all optical data link
frame buffers.

What little you know about it would fit onto the tip of a molecular
probe.
 
J

JackShephard

Jan 1, 1970
0
This is yet another attempt by you to shift the topic to a totally irreleant
point. And the poor quality of your post leaves me wondering; what
technology comes from JPL?


The holographic memory, which was being discussed, idiot. The
technology is 40 years old. The actual hardware is just recently
becoming a reality.

How far behind are you going to fall before you actually do a little
reading?

Do try to keep up.
 
J

JackShephard

Jan 1, 1970
0
Not fair to Radium. He appears to not be an electronics whiz, but he does
seem to be a nice kid.


I called you idiots stupid for jumping on him. If you want to call that
"mean", fine.

The fact remains that you treated him like shit, and still do, and you
have been treating me like shit.
 
J

JackShephard

Jan 1, 1970
0
There you go again moving the subject and casting aspersions not in
evidence.

More and more you appear to be a troll.


What do you call the way you guys treated Radium? And what do you call
all the little peanut gallery comments you have made about him to each
other since your initial replies to him.

Your a total piece of shit, and you just can't handle being called on
it.
 
J

JackShephard

Jan 1, 1970
0
On May 27, 2:50 am, "Michael A. Terrell" <[email protected]>
wrote:
[... JPL ...]
Yawn. Look at the thousands of ideas they have pumped out since
their inception that lead nowhere. It is a research center, ad their
job is to test theories. Some work, and some don't. Think "Tax funded
Edison Labs".


This is also true of the other national labs. JPL has a better
success rate than Edison. They generally don't attack a problem with
more brains and less brute force than Edison did. Still, however, if
a majority of the things they looked into panned out, they wouldn't be
doing their jobs.

Their technologies are on just about every research satellite and probe
ever launched.
 
D

Don Bowey

Jan 1, 1970
0
No, I did not. The Terrell idiot "bragged", as you call it, about bubble
memory, and even posted some lame joke RAM link. AFTER his remarks about
bubble memory, I posted a remark about what IS the modern day equivalent
of it, which is MRAM.

The remarks about OC768 were related to optical memory, because the
application FOR optical memory will primarily be all optical data link
frame buffers.

What little you know about it would fit onto the tip of a molecular
probe.

You have a certain skill at bending the truth, Dork Matter.

I think I will just ignore you as useless.
 
S

Sjouke Burry

Jan 1, 1970
0
JackShephard said:
What do you call the way you guys treated Radium? And what do you call
all the little peanut gallery comments you have made about him to each
other since your initial replies to him.

Your a total piece of shit, and you just can't handle being called on
it.
Radium invented trolling.
(Oh and he also invented questions with a maximum
stupidity content).
 
J

JackShephard

Jan 1, 1970
0
You have a certain skill at bending the truth, Dork Matter.

Where? He DID mention it first, so your pathetic remark previously
doesn't stand up. Also, holo memory WILL be for optical nets, so you
really ARE clueless about it. So far, I see no bending whatsoever, so
you could iterate what you are spewing about, or run away, as usual.

I think I will just ignore you as useless.

You think? I am sure that I don't believe that claim.

Run away... that's real good, Donny.
 
B

Bob Myers

Jan 1, 1970
0
JackShephard said:
I have more character in one of my toenail clippings than you do in
your entire, pathetic, EE Times, JPL hating body

In that case, would you please ask one of your toenail
clippings to start posting here in your place? I'm sure they
would provide far more mature and worthwhile contributions
than you've been able to provide to date.

Bob M.
 
B

Bob Myers

Jan 1, 1970
0
JackShephard said:
Your a total piece of shit, and you just can't handle being called on
it.

The word is "you're," a contraction of "you are."

As in, "you're welcome."


Bob M.
 
Top