B
Bob Myers
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Michael A. Terrell said:You do know that "Jack" is "Dark Matter", don't you?
I certainly have the impression that large parts of him are, yes.
Most of those would be above the neck.
Bob M.
Michael A. Terrell said:You do know that "Jack" is "Dark Matter", don't you?
JackShephard said:The fact remains that you treated him like shit, and still do, and you
have been treating me like shit.
Bob said:In that case, would you please ask one of your toenail
clippings to start posting here in your place? I'm sure they
would provide far more mature and worthwhile contributions
than you've been able to provide to date.
Bob M.
Bob said:Oh, not at all, Jack, old man. For one thing, I could
respect shit.
In that case, would you please ask one of your toenail
clippings to start posting here in your place? I'm sure they
would provide far more mature and worthwhile contributions
than you've been able to provide to date.
The word is "you're," a contraction of "you are."
As in, "you're welcome."
Bob M.
Oh, not at all, Jack, old man. For one thing, I could
respect shit.
Radium invented trolling.
(Oh and he also invented questions with a maximum
stupidity content).
JackShephard said:So **** you, and your little grammar, spelling, and usage dog too.
JackShephard said:So, you are saying, like Terrell, that EE Times is lame, and that JPL is
lame, and that this holographic memory array is "vaporware?
Notice that the only people I "insulted" were those that insulted him,On May 27, 8:35 pm, Sjouke Burry
[....]Radium invented trolling.
(Oh and he also invented questions with a maximum
stupidity content).
Trolling was around long before Radium. His ideas may be a waste of
time but he doesn't seem to be causing trouble on purpose. He also
doesn't interject into others peoples conversions. I have yet to see
him attempt to insult anyone.
Do you think the heat generated and power requirements will decrease
when photonic chips are available?
I am thinking of a purely optical computer that is powered by a main
400 nm laser. The main laser if of course powered by electricity.
This optical PC contains 400 nm lasers but no LEDs. AFAIK, lasers tend
to be more efficient that LEDs.
So do you think a chip based on lasers - instead of electricity - can
be as real-time, hardware, and digital as possible while using the
least amount of buffering required [hopefully none] and experiencing
the least amount of latency possible [again, hopefully none] and at
the same time being high-speed not getting hot enough to need any
cooling equipment?
I think it would be easier to do this in photonics that electronics.
Since electronics seem to easily overheat.
Do you think the heat generated and power requirements will decrease
when photonic chips are available?
When/if chips go photonic, I fully expect the makers to cram as much
in as they can and not have the part melt. Faster chips gain the
maker more dollars per acre than slower ones. As a result, they will
always push the speed up to the limit of their technology.
The big thing that using light gains will be speed. Even there, the
speeds people are getting over copper interconnects is increasing with
time.
[....]
Why ever would you want 400nM?
I'd suggest 780nM. Take a look at:
socrates.berkeley.edu/~budker/papers/pdfs/hole_burning_pdftex.pdf
Notice how using light right near the D2 line allows you to do things
that cause Lasers to interact.
This optical PC contains 400 nm lasers but no LEDs. AFAIK, lasers tend
to be more efficient that LEDs.So do you think a chip based on lasers - instead of electricity - can
be as real-time, hardware, and digital as possible while using the
least amount of buffering required [hopefully none] and experiencing
the least amount of latency possible [again, hopefully none] and at
the same time being high-speed not getting hot enough to need any
cooling equipment?I think it would be easier to do this in photonics that electronics.
Since electronics seem to easily overheat.
Shorter wavelengths usually allow more bandwidth. AFAIK, 400 nm is the
shortest wavelength in which you are safe from ionizing radiation. At
wavelengths shorter than 400 nm, your risk of cancer increases.
Conventional CDs use red lasers. Blu-ray uses 405 nm.
Notice how using light right near the D2 line allows you to do things
that cause Lasers to interact.This optical PC contains 400 nm lasers but no LEDs. AFAIK, lasers tend
to be more efficient that LEDs.
So do you think a chip based on lasers - instead of electricity - can
be as real-time, hardware, and digital as possible while using the
least amount of buffering required [hopefully none] and experiencing
the least amount of latency possible [again, hopefully none] and at
the same time being high-speed not getting hot enough to need any
cooling equipment?
I think it would be easier to do this in photonics that electronics.
Since electronics seem to easily overheat.
Do you think chips will be made of photonic circuits -- instead of
electric -- in the next 20 years?
Shorter wavelengths usually allow more bandwidth. AFAIK, 400 nm is the
shortest wavelength in which you are safe from ionizing radiation. At
wavelengths shorter than 400 nm, your risk of cancer increases.
Conventional CDs use red lasers. Blu-ray uses 405 nm.
If you mean a purely optical system, as opposed to having
just pieces here and there rely on some optical phenomenon
(e.g., the "holographic" memory which has been mentioned
here) - no, there is no likelihood of that at all. The reasons
have already been given here, at great length.
Shorter wavelengths in general permit signals of greater
bandwidth, but the available bandwidth of even infrared
light (longer than 780 nm or so) is so huge already that this
isn't the issue. The reason that Blu-Ray or HD-DVD use
blue lasers is not because of the bandwidth capability
implied by the shorter wavelength, but because it permits
smaller physical structures in the disc to be used for
storage (and hence increases the capacity of the disc per
unit area over their "red-laser" cousins). In other words,
"red" light could easily carry information at the rate necessary
for a Blu-Ray disc; it just can't "see" the disc properly to
read it.
If you mean a purely optical system, as opposed to having
just pieces here and there rely on some optical phenomenon
(e.g., the "holographic" memory which has been mentioned
here) - no, there is no likelihood of that at all. The reasons
have already been given here, at great length.
There are already segments of optical network links that are all
optical.
Notice that the only people I "insulted" were those that insulted him,On May 27, 8:35 pm, Sjouke Burry
[....]Radium invented trolling.
(Oh and he also invented questions with a maximum
stupidity content).
Trolling was around long before Radium. His ideas may be a waste of
time but he doesn't seem to be causing trouble on purpose. He also
doesn't interject into others peoples conversions. I have yet to see
him attempt to insult anyone.
and that was damned near everyone that responded to him.
Oh, and this is USENET. There are no "other people's conversations".
Nice try though, and thanks for not being yet another idiot on the
"lets beat up Radium" bandwagon, even though you do appear to be running
along side the "lets call Jack a troll" bandwagon.
No shit? Who wudda ever thunk that optical networks would be
optical.