Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Wire Wrap

G

GT

Jan 1, 1970
0
I would like to wire wrap some small hobby circuits. I figure 30AWG is
correct for me. I see Digikey (http://dkc3.digikey.com/PDF/T051/1323.pdf)
has regular wrap and modified wrap. Which one is best to use?

Also I saw a post that suggested wire wrap is obsolete. I can not imagine
how that could be because it seems perfect for small prototype and hobby --
do others out here wire wrap? Is there a better way to do small hobby stuff
(I do like breadboad but some stuff I'd like to keep for a while and so
wirewrap seems better).

Thanks for any advice.
 
M

Michael Black

Jan 1, 1970
0
GT" ([email protected]) said:
I would like to wire wrap some small hobby circuits. I figure 30AWG is
correct for me. I see Digikey (http://dkc3.digikey.com/PDF/T051/1323.pdf)
has regular wrap and modified wrap. Which one is best to use?

Also I saw a post that suggested wire wrap is obsolete. I can not imagine
how that could be because it seems perfect for small prototype and hobby --
do others out here wire wrap? Is there a better way to do small hobby stuff
(I do like breadboad but some stuff I'd like to keep for a while and so
wirewrap seems better).

Thanks for any advice.

BUt you might start by saying why you think it would be good
for the hobbyist.

Real wire wrap is multiple turns of wire around leads intended for
wire wrap, and it counts on the wire biting into the leads for good
contact. You need IC sockets that are long enough, and if I recall
properly, the leads of those sockets should be square. Done
badly, it can add to problems, and note that while wire wrap was once
common, it's not happening much anymore. I don't think anyone felt it was
particularly good for analog, and one does not see real wire wrap done on
resistor or capacitor leads, one sees those soldered or plugged into pins
that can be properly wire wrapped.

I would guess you think it's good for the hobbyist because the
wires can be unwound if you want to change things, or reuse the parts.

But soldering is not a problem, once you get used to it. And when
components aren't big and heavy, there's little need for a mechanical
joint before the solder, so you can just tack solder the leads together.
Then they are very easy to take apart when needed.

One of the best routes for the beginner (and oldtimer) is to take
a piece of copper circuit board, and use that as the "chassis". Every
ground connection is soldered to the board, and then the parts reside
above that copper ground surface. Usually, there are enough leads
to ground to support the other components. It's really easy to change
things, and there is ample lead length on the components for
making most of the connections. Some scrap wire does the rest. YOu
get a very good ground surface this way, and unlike something like
perfboard, you don't require much effort to change things.

Of course, you may not be asking about real wire wrap. There were
things referred to as "wire wrap" where one twirls the wire around
a component lead, but then you do solder the joint. But it actually
ends up being quite cumbersome to remove components.

Michael
 
G

Graham Knott

Jan 1, 1970
0
GT said:
I would like to wire wrap some small hobby circuits. I figure 30AWG
is correct for me. I see Digikey
(http://dkc3.digikey.com/PDF/T051/1323.pdf) has regular wrap and
modified wrap. Which one is best to use?

Also I saw a post that suggested wire wrap is obsolete. I can not
imagine how that could be because it seems perfect for small
prototype and hobby -- do others out here wire wrap? Is there a
better way to do small hobby stuff (I do like breadboad but some
stuff I'd like to keep for a while and so wirewrap seems better).

Thanks for any advice.

--
Have a look at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.knott/elect97.htm


My most uptodate website is
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/g.knott/index.htm
 
C

Chris

Jan 1, 1970
0
GT said:
I would like to wire wrap some small hobby circuits. I figure 30AWG is
correct for me. I see Digikey (http://dkc3.digikey.com/PDF/T051/1323.pdf)
has regular wrap and modified wrap. Which one is best to use?

Also I saw a post that suggested wire wrap is obsolete. I can not imagine
how that could be because it seems perfect for small prototype and hobby --
do others out here wire wrap? Is there a better way to do small hobby stuff
(I do like breadboad but some stuff I'd like to keep for a while and so
wirewrap seems better).

Thanks for any advice.

Wire wrap is fairly easy, but has a bit of a learning curve, and is
difficult to do well.

As another post mentioned, the process involves twisting wire (usually
30AWG) around a square wire wrap post with a wire wrap tool. If the
job is done right, the edge of the wire wrap post will bite into the
surface of the wire, galling it and creating a cold weld. (You can
feel whether a wire wrap is good by unwinding it. If you've done it
right, the wire will pull as you unstick the gall for each quarter
wind.) If the job is done right, the cold weld joint is sturdy and
should take the same abuse as a solder joint while maintaining a good
gas-tight electrical connection. You require special wire wrap sockets
for everything you're wire wrapping, or you can solder connections to
discrete components and just use the special sockets for ICs. If you
do get those, make sure you buy the sockets that have 3-deep posts.
Otherwise, you'll run out of room unless you really think out each
daisy chain first. Obviously wire wrap IC sockets are quite a bit more
expensive than plain IC sockets.

The problem is doing it right. Most hobbyists working with a small
hand tool end up with intermittent electrical connections and a lot of
frustration in trying to debug, not to mention nicked and easily broken
wire ends where the insulation strip was a little aggressive. As an
extra added bonus, a poor wire wrap frequently results in unwinding a
lot of stuff in very cramped quarters, with the possibility of
disturbing adjacent wire wrap joints. (This is covered in the link
shown in another post.)

You can see where this is headed. I feel a hobbyist should stick with
soldered connections. A good place to start for newbies is a perfboard
with a layout similar to the protoboard you're probably already using
to check circuits out. Radio Shack sells a perfboard with 4-pad 0.1"
spacing, just like your protoboard. It's the same size as their small
protoboard, and you can transfer your circuits right over from one to
the other. If you've got a small soldering iron, some solder, and some
24- or 26-gauge solid wire, you can do this easily. It will also give
you some additional practice in soldering.

Good luck with your projects.
Chris
 
R

Roger Johansson

Jan 1, 1970
0
Chris said:
You can see where this is headed. I feel a hobbyist should stick with
soldered connections. A good place to start for newbies is a
perfboard with a layout similar to the protoboard you're probably
already using to check circuits out. Radio Shack sells a perfboard
with 4-pad 0.1" spacing, just like your protoboard. It's the same
size as their small protoboard, and you can transfer your circuits
right over from one to the other. If you've got a small soldering
iron, some solder, and some 24- or 26-gauge solid wire, you can do
this easily. It will also give you some additional practice in
soldering.

Good advice above.

There are other methods which can be combined in any way you like.
The goal is to connect two or more points (nodes) with another
electrically. Exactly how it is done is less important.

I often take a piece of copper laminate (pcb material) and clean it
with a kitchen sponge, the abrasive type.
Then I use a sharp tool, like the end of a file, and make grooves in
the copper surface, dividing it into small squares.

I make more squares than I expect I will need.
When you experiment you need space, so try not to cram things together
too much.

Then I can solder components between these copper "islands".
Modern surface mount components can be used, and older components too,
by cutting and bending the wires and soldering them to copper islands.

By avoiding holes we save ourselves a lot of extra work and machinery
for drilling. Or expensive prototype boards with pads and holes.
(but this type of board is also a good alternative, it is just a little
more expensive than buying pcb material in some surplus shop)

In this way I can experiment, move and change components, and the
circuit will be in a usable state afterwards.

I bought a solderless protoboard once, but I never use it, because I
hate having to take circuits apart and rebuilding them a second time.
By experimenting by soldering you get a result which is directly
usable, or if you want to save your experiments.
The same circuit can come in handy later, so I save all experiments.
I might also need a special component which I can take off an earlier
experiment.

Circuits which are to be used are placed in a box, so it doesn't matter
much what the circuit board looks like, it is the function which is
important.

Forget about wire-wrapping. It is a very complicated way to connect two
points electrically, it is expensive, needs special sockets, wire and
tools, and is simply antiquated. You cannot use modern smd components
with wire wrapping. We as hobbyists or experimenters will need to use
both smd and old components for a few decades, until there are no more
wire components in the surplus shops and in our shelfs.

So use a method which can use both types of components.

Later you will need to learn about etching and making custom made pcb's
for yourself, but that is for circuits you need to produce more than
one of, or if you need to miniturize a circuit.
Etched pcb's are not suitable for experimenting so you still need the
methods above for experimenting.

Some people skip the experiments with real components and use a SPICE
simulator in the computer to experiment, test a circuit, then design a
circuit board, print out, etch it into copper laminate, build the
circuit.

Others think it is more fun to sit at the workbench with a soldering
iron in hand, building as you like for the moment, see what happens :)
 
T

Tom Woodrow

Jan 1, 1970
0
I don't want to get into the argument about a hobbyisy doing or not
doing wire wrap. I have used ww for about 30 years and still use it
ocassionally.

A "regular" wire wrap wraps just the wire around the post. This provides
sufficient strength for 26 ga. BUT for 30 ga you would want to use the
modified wrap. The "modified" wrap is setup to wrap about 1 1/2 to 2
turns of the kynar insulation around the base of the wrap to provide
support (strength) for the wrap. After the insulation wrap comes the
wire wrapping.

The downside of the modified wrap id that it gives you a very small
inductor at each termination, so this may not be very goot for ultra
high frequency circuits and you may need some extra termination (r/c) on
some lines to prevent ringing (not that likely, but I have seen it happen).

Tom Woodrow
www.dacworks.com
 
B

Byron A Jeff

Jan 1, 1970
0
I would like to wire wrap some small hobby circuits. I figure 30AWG is
correct for me. I see Digikey (http://dkc3.digikey.com/PDF/T051/1323.pdf)
has regular wrap and modified wrap. Which one is best to use?

Modified wrap. However I wouldn't buy anything from off that Digikey page.
Wow that's expensive!

I still wrap boards with the handy dandy manual tool from Radio Shack.

http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?catalog_name=CTLG&product_id=276-1570

Not fancy but gets the job done.

As for wire, the RatShack carries red, white, and blue. I get other colors
locally here in Atlanta. However if you need mail order then
Jameco has a good deal. Here is their catalog page:

http://www.jameco.com/Jameco/catalogs/c252/P88.pdf

Wire wrap sockets are on page 111.
Also I saw a post that suggested wire wrap is obsolete. I can not imagine
how that could be because it seems perfect for small prototype and hobby --
do others out here wire wrap?

Yes. Like everything else it has its advantages and disadvantages. When
properly done wire wrap is stable. I have WW boards in use that are
approaching 10 years old. Also WW is usually easy to fix as wires can
be unwrapped just as easily as they are wrapped.

On the down side sockets are expensive. 3 level wrap will triple the
depth of your board. Managing individual components can be problematic.
Header plugs such as the one listed on page 112 of the Jameco catalog
are helpful in this regard.

But it certainly works. You can see a sample of my handywork on my PIC
Designer: http://www.finitesite.com/d3jsys/picdesigner/underside.html

Is there a better way to do small hobby stuff
(I do like breadboad but some stuff I'd like to keep for a while and so
wirewrap seems better).

Again it's debatable. I find that I get to frustrated with soldering
screwups to do it consistently. That's why I've never moved permanently
from wire wrap.

I would advise you to get into wire wrap cheap (leave DigiKey alone!)
and give it a whirl.

BAJ
 
One other method for prototyping, which is probably the cheapest
imaginable is this: One piece of softwood and a box of coppered nails
(sometimes called hardboard pins).
Draw the circuit on the timber, and drive a pin into the wood at
connection points. The pins can be linked together by wire, soldered at
each pin. Components are connected by the same method.
It's cheap, and relatively robust (better than building a 'christmas
tree' in mid-air). It's a method I always use for initial circuit
ideas.

- Martin T.
 
Top