Merlin3189
- Aug 4, 2011
- 250
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 250
For what it may be worth, the report claims to be produced by.... No faculty members are named. .... The Griffith University "Power Electronic and Magnetics research Lab" mentioned in the "report" doesn't get any hits on Google (apart from the "report" itself). Does it even exist?
"Junwei Lu" http://www.griffith.edu.au/engineer...school-engineering/staff/professor-jun-wei-lu and
"Chirag Panchal", http://www.griffith.edu.au/science-...technology-centre/rhd-students/chirag-panchal who appears to be a research student supervised by Junwei Lu.
As you say, even on their website there is no mention of "Power Electronic and Magnetics research Lab", as far as I can see.
On the summary report itself, which I am unable to evaluate (btw has anyone seen the actual report?), I am surprised that the power is measured downstream of the PFC device. I'm no expert on this, but I thought PFC affected only the upstream power consumption, adding cost for the suppliers rather than the user. Power supply companies and EEC regulations require PFC for large consumers. If users always made savings by PFC, would they need regulations?
Of course this device does not work in the same way as normal PFC and apparently no current at all can flow through it, so it may not matter where it is connected. (Though the instructions seem to say otherwise.)