Help with barking dog

[Gabriel Knight]

Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop or annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my computer room I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make it silent.
Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the diagram, etc, to make
myself or can you by them?

Thanks
GK

 

[atec7 7]

Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop or annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog?

not under any circumstances

I have a dog next to my computer room I

would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make it silent.
Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the diagram, etc, to make
myself or can you by them?

you need to take a video and present it and a complaint to the council
after you have discussed the matter with your neighbour

 

[L.A.T.]

Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop or annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my computer room I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make it
silent. Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the diagram, etc,
to make myself or can you by them?

Thanks
GK

These devices seldom work as desired or as advertised.
Disagreements between neighbours almost never end well.
This irritating animal is probably someone's loved companion.
Industrial grade earmuffs are fairly cheap, comfortable, and effective.
If you think of earmuffs as a smart solution rather than a surrender,
everyone wins.

 

[Mr.T]

There have been various "pet scarer" circuits published (I remember one in
EPE) - these have enjoyed some discussion on the web, so a search should
uncover a few useful references.

Basically you need an ultrasonic oscillator (preferably pulsed) with a
full-bridge PA stage, check out the audiophile shops for a piezo tweeter,
this is the most powerful transducer I can think of thats easy to buy.

If the local authority is anything like here in the UK, they won't take much
notice of one person complaining, your only real option is to wind the dog
up until it barks constantly day and night and pisses off half the street -
should have an animal control officer around within a week.

Or simply record the barking, and play it at loud volume every night when
the neighbours are home. (a horn speaker directed at their house will work
best) When they complain you say, but I don't have a dog, it must be yours!

MrT.

 

[Trevor Wilson]

Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop or annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my computer room I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make it
silent. Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the diagram, etc,
to make myself or can you by them?

**Talk to your neighbour. If that fails, talk to the local government. It is
easy enough to rent a device that fits around the dog's neck, that causes
the barking habit to be curbed significantly. Usually, they're available
from the local council or the local vet.

 

[Erik Vastmasd]

Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop or annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my computer room I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make it silent.
Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the diagram, etc, to make
myself or can you by them?

The only sort of action that is legal in Australia is to report the
barking dog to your local Council. They will probably ask you to record
a log of when the barking takes place and on the basis of what the log
contains they may take action.

 

[Jasen Betts]

Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop or annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my computer room I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make it silent.
Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the diagram, etc, to make
myself or can you by them?

free software like audacity can make ultrasonic sounds, and you have a
computer right where it's needed.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: [email protected] ---

 

[Sylvia Else]

These devices seldom work as desired or as advertised.

I obtained one on approval. Totally useless. It certainly didn't stop
the dog from barking. Whether it annoyed the dog into barking more was
difficult to tell, since the dog barked pretty much continuously anyway.

Sylvia.

 

[Trevor Wilson]

I obtained one on approval. Totally useless. It certainly didn't stop the
dog from barking. Whether it annoyed the dog into barking more was
difficult to tell, since the dog barked pretty much continuously anyway.

**What sort of device was it? I am aware of one type, that sprays an
unpleasant, but harmless, chemical near the dog's nose, every time it barks.
I know of a couple of people who rented these devices and they worked
perfectly. In one case, it only took a week. In the other case, it took two
weeks and the dog ceased barking. The other method I know of, but have
serious misgivings about, is a surgical procedure where the dog is
'de-barked'. I've seen the results of that too.

 

[Sylvia Else]

**What sort of device was it? I am aware of one type, that sprays an
unpleasant, but harmless, chemical near the dog's nose, every time it barks.
I know of a couple of people who rented these devices and they worked
perfectly. In one case, it only took a week. In the other case, it took two
weeks and the dog ceased barking. The other method I know of, but have
serious misgivings about, is a surgical procedure where the dog is
'de-barked'. I've seen the results of that too.

The device emitted a very loud ultrasonic noise which was supposed to be
unpleasant to the dog. The theory is that the dog recognises the link
between barking and the noise, and thus desists.

The device you're talking about has to be attached to the dog,
presumably by its collar. There are also devices, that I've had good
reports on, that administer a mild electric shock when the dog barks
(but bleeding-hearts got them banned in NSW[*]). However both such
devices require the cooperation of the owner, and such options are not
available of the owner is indifferent, or actually oblivious.

I eventually set up a microphone and sound activated recording software
and created a log which I sent to the council. Only then to learn that
the tenant was being evicted anyway.

[*] Apparently they are considered cruel, even though people have tried
the devices on themselves, and the shock is no more than unpleasant. And
the device is not as cruel as a brick through the dog's skull when the
neighbour is not looking.

Sylvia.

 

[Sylvia Else]

On 26/05/2010 6:25 AM, L.A.T. wrote:
Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop or
annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my computer
room
I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make it
silent. Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the diagram,
etc,
to make myself or can you by them?

Thanks
GK
These devices seldom work as desired or as advertised.

I obtained one on approval. Totally useless. It certainly didn't stop
the
dog from barking. Whether it annoyed the dog into barking more was
difficult to tell, since the dog barked pretty much continuously anyway.

**What sort of device was it? I am aware of one type, that sprays an
unpleasant, but harmless, chemical near the dog's nose, every time it
barks.
I know of a couple of people who rented these devices and they worked
perfectly. In one case, it only took a week. In the other case, it took
two
weeks and the dog ceased barking. The other method I know of, but have
serious misgivings about, is a surgical procedure where the dog is
'de-barked'. I've seen the results of that too.

The device emitted a very loud ultrasonic noise which was supposed to be
unpleasant to the dog. The theory is that the dog recognises the link
between barking and the noise, and thus desists.

The device you're talking about has to be attached to the dog, presumably
by its collar. There are also devices, that I've had good reports on, that
administer a mild electric shock when the dog barks (but bleeding-hearts
got them banned in NSW[*]). However both such devices require the
cooperation of the owner, and such options are not available of the owner
is indifferent, or actually oblivious.

I eventually set up a microphone and sound activated recording software
and created a log which I sent to the council. Only then to learn that the
tenant was being evicted anyway.

[*] Apparently they are considered cruel, even though people have tried
the devices on themselves, and the shock is no more than unpleasant. And
the device is not as cruel as a brick through the dog's skull when the
neighbour is not looking.

Sylvia.

I'd definately go with pulsed ultrasonics, with a home brew unit and a well
powerful piezo tweeter you can tweak the tone and pulse rate to perfection
so it literally drives the dog mad.

This should cause sufficient distress to the owner when they have to have it
put down that they think twice before getting another.

I found a posting I made elsewhere about the results of my microphone
based survey:

"Over a period of 20 days the dogs barked a total of
6685 times, an average of over 334 times a day. On one day the dogs
barked over one thousand times."

I doubt the owner of such dogs is going to notice any increase that can
be induced. As I noted ealier, the problem went away, but I think it's
naive to suppose that owners can be driven having their pets put down.

Sylvia.

 

[terryc]

This should cause sufficient distress to the owner when they have to
have it put down that they think twice before getting another.

Naah, that one was obviously faulty and lightning doesn't strike the same
place twice.

Basic rule, in the city/burbs, a dog has to be part of the family and get
given a decent amount of time each day. Otherwise, like kids, they go nut
job.

 

[ian field]

On 27/05/2010 10:21 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 26/05/2010 6:25 AM, L.A.T. wrote:
Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop or
annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my computer
room
I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make it
silent. Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the
diagram,
etc,
to make myself or can you by them?

Thanks
GK
These devices seldom work as desired or as advertised.

I obtained one on approval. Totally useless. It certainly didn't stop
the
dog from barking. Whether it annoyed the dog into barking more was
difficult to tell, since the dog barked pretty much continuously
anyway.

**What sort of device was it? I am aware of one type, that sprays an
unpleasant, but harmless, chemical near the dog's nose, every time it
barks.
I know of a couple of people who rented these devices and they worked
perfectly. In one case, it only took a week. In the other case, it took
two
weeks and the dog ceased barking. The other method I know of, but have
serious misgivings about, is a surgical procedure where the dog is
'de-barked'. I've seen the results of that too.


The device emitted a very loud ultrasonic noise which was supposed to be
unpleasant to the dog. The theory is that the dog recognises the link
between barking and the noise, and thus desists.

The device you're talking about has to be attached to the dog,
presumably
by its collar. There are also devices, that I've had good reports on,
that
administer a mild electric shock when the dog barks (but bleeding-hearts
got them banned in NSW[*]). However both such devices require the
cooperation of the owner, and such options are not available of the
owner
is indifferent, or actually oblivious.

I eventually set up a microphone and sound activated recording software
and created a log which I sent to the council. Only then to learn that
the
tenant was being evicted anyway.

[*] Apparently they are considered cruel, even though people have tried
the devices on themselves, and the shock is no more than unpleasant. And
the device is not as cruel as a brick through the dog's skull when the
neighbour is not looking.

Sylvia.

I'd definately go with pulsed ultrasonics, with a home brew unit and a
well
powerful piezo tweeter you can tweak the tone and pulse rate to
perfection
so it literally drives the dog mad.

This should cause sufficient distress to the owner when they have to have
it
put down that they think twice before getting another.

I found a posting I made elsewhere about the results of my microphone
based survey:

"Over a period of 20 days the dogs barked a total of
6685 times, an average of over 334 times a day. On one day the dogs
barked over one thousand times."

I doubt the owner of such dogs is going to notice any increase that can be
induced. As I noted ealier, the problem went away, but I think it's naive
to suppose that owners can be driven having their pets put down.

They can if it goes mad and savages a family member.

 

[Sylvia Else]

On 27/05/2010 10:21 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 26/05/2010 6:25 AM, L.A.T. wrote:
Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop or
annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my computer
room
I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make it
silent. Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the
diagram,
etc,
to make myself or can you by them?

Thanks
GK
These devices seldom work as desired or as advertised.

I obtained one on approval. Totally useless. It certainly didn't stop
the
dog from barking. Whether it annoyed the dog into barking more was
difficult to tell, since the dog barked pretty much continuously
anyway.

**What sort of device was it? I am aware of one type, that sprays an
unpleasant, but harmless, chemical near the dog's nose, every time it
barks.
I know of a couple of people who rented these devices and they worked
perfectly. In one case, it only took a week. In the other case, it took
two
weeks and the dog ceased barking. The other method I know of, but have
serious misgivings about, is a surgical procedure where the dog is
'de-barked'. I've seen the results of that too.


The device emitted a very loud ultrasonic noise which was supposed to be
unpleasant to the dog. The theory is that the dog recognises the link
between barking and the noise, and thus desists.

The device you're talking about has to be attached to the dog,
presumably
by its collar. There are also devices, that I've had good reports on,
that
administer a mild electric shock when the dog barks (but bleeding-hearts
got them banned in NSW[*]). However both such devices require the
cooperation of the owner, and such options are not available of the
owner
is indifferent, or actually oblivious.

I eventually set up a microphone and sound activated recording software
and created a log which I sent to the council. Only then to learn that
the
tenant was being evicted anyway.

[*] Apparently they are considered cruel, even though people have tried
the devices on themselves, and the shock is no more than unpleasant. And
the device is not as cruel as a brick through the dog's skull when the
neighbour is not looking.

Sylvia.


I'd definately go with pulsed ultrasonics, with a home brew unit and a
well
powerful piezo tweeter you can tweak the tone and pulse rate to
perfection
so it literally drives the dog mad.

This should cause sufficient distress to the owner when they have to have
it
put down that they think twice before getting another.

I found a posting I made elsewhere about the results of my microphone
based survey:

"Over a period of 20 days the dogs barked a total of
6685 times, an average of over 334 times a day. On one day the dogs
barked over one thousand times."

I doubt the owner of such dogs is going to notice any increase that can be
induced. As I noted ealier, the problem went away, but I think it's naive
to suppose that owners can be driven having their pets put down.

They can if it goes mad and savages a family member.

If it attacks anyone unprovoked, the authorities will probably require
that it be put down, regardless of the owner's desire.

But I don't think ultransonic noise is going to have that outcome.

Anyone know the optimum dose of LSD per kg for a dog?

Sylvia.

 

[Sylvia Else]

On 28/05/2010 6:24 AM, ian field wrote:
On 27/05/2010 10:21 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 26/05/2010 6:25 AM, L.A.T. wrote:
Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop
or
annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my computer
room
I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and make
it
silent. Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the
diagram,
etc,
to make myself or can you by them?

Thanks
GK
These devices seldom work as desired or as advertised.

I obtained one on approval. Totally useless. It certainly didn't
stop
the
dog from barking. Whether it annoyed the dog into barking more was
difficult to tell, since the dog barked pretty much continuously
anyway.

**What sort of device was it? I am aware of one type, that sprays an
unpleasant, but harmless, chemical near the dog's nose, every time it
barks.
I know of a couple of people who rented these devices and they worked
perfectly. In one case, it only took a week. In the other case, it
took
two
weeks and the dog ceased barking. The other method I know of, but
have
serious misgivings about, is a surgical procedure where the dog is
'de-barked'. I've seen the results of that too.


The device emitted a very loud ultrasonic noise which was supposed to
be
unpleasant to the dog. The theory is that the dog recognises the link
between barking and the noise, and thus desists.

The device you're talking about has to be attached to the dog,
presumably
by its collar. There are also devices, that I've had good reports on,
that
administer a mild electric shock when the dog barks (but
bleeding-hearts
got them banned in NSW[*]). However both such devices require the
cooperation of the owner, and such options are not available of the
owner
is indifferent, or actually oblivious.

I eventually set up a microphone and sound activated recording
software
and created a log which I sent to the council. Only then to learn that
the
tenant was being evicted anyway.

[*] Apparently they are considered cruel, even though people have
tried
the devices on themselves, and the shock is no more than unpleasant.
And
the device is not as cruel as a brick through the dog's skull when the
neighbour is not looking.

Sylvia.


I'd definately go with pulsed ultrasonics, with a home brew unit and a
well
powerful piezo tweeter you can tweak the tone and pulse rate to
perfection
so it literally drives the dog mad.

This should cause sufficient distress to the owner when they have to
have
it
put down that they think twice before getting another.


I found a posting I made elsewhere about the results of my microphone
based survey:

"Over a period of 20 days the dogs barked a total of
6685 times, an average of over 334 times a day. On one day the dogs
barked over one thousand times."

I doubt the owner of such dogs is going to notice any increase that can
be
induced. As I noted ealier, the problem went away, but I think it's
naive
to suppose that owners can be driven having their pets put down.

They can if it goes mad and savages a family member.

If it attacks anyone unprovoked, the authorities will probably require
that it be put down, regardless of the owner's desire.

But I don't think ultransonic noise is going to have that outcome.

Anyone know the optimum dose of LSD per kg for a dog?

Ultrasonics is likely a lot cheaper than enough LSD to send a dog mad and
won't show up on autopsy/investigation - or get you arrested buying the
stuff. With homebrew kit you can tweak tone and pulse rate for best effect.

Pulsed or warbling ultrasonic really will do a dog's head in, years ago BT
took away our beloved red telephone box in my street and replaced it with a
modern stainless-steel open plan phone kiosk, unfortunately they mounted it
facing south-west - from where the wind always brings heavy rain. When the
phone got wet it started emitting a high pitched whistling noise (no way of
knowing whether it was also emitting ultrasonic) but when it was whistling I
could hear dozens of dogs barking continuously in the surrounding houses.

Needless to say BT were persuaded to effect a remedy rather rapidly.

It may well be that such noises will provoke barking. I don't dispute
that. The question is whether they'll cause an attack on a human so as
to get the animal put down.

Sylvia.

 

[ian field]

On 28/05/2010 11:42 PM, ian field wrote:
On 28/05/2010 6:24 AM, ian field wrote:
On 27/05/2010 10:21 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 26/05/2010 6:25 AM, L.A.T. wrote:
Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop
or
annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my
computer
room
I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and
make
it
silent. Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the
diagram,
etc,
to make myself or can you by them?

Thanks
GK
These devices seldom work as desired or as advertised.

I obtained one on approval. Totally useless. It certainly didn't
stop
the
dog from barking. Whether it annoyed the dog into barking more was
difficult to tell, since the dog barked pretty much continuously
anyway.

**What sort of device was it? I am aware of one type, that sprays
an
unpleasant, but harmless, chemical near the dog's nose, every time
it
barks.
I know of a couple of people who rented these devices and they
worked
perfectly. In one case, it only took a week. In the other case, it
took
two
weeks and the dog ceased barking. The other method I know of, but
have
serious misgivings about, is a surgical procedure where the dog is
'de-barked'. I've seen the results of that too.


The device emitted a very loud ultrasonic noise which was supposed
to
be
unpleasant to the dog. The theory is that the dog recognises the
link
between barking and the noise, and thus desists.

The device you're talking about has to be attached to the dog,
presumably
by its collar. There are also devices, that I've had good reports
on,
that
administer a mild electric shock when the dog barks (but
bleeding-hearts
got them banned in NSW[*]). However both such devices require the
cooperation of the owner, and such options are not available of the
owner
is indifferent, or actually oblivious.

I eventually set up a microphone and sound activated recording
software
and created a log which I sent to the council. Only then to learn
that
the
tenant was being evicted anyway.

[*] Apparently they are considered cruel, even though people have
tried
the devices on themselves, and the shock is no more than unpleasant.
And
the device is not as cruel as a brick through the dog's skull when
the
neighbour is not looking.

Sylvia.


I'd definately go with pulsed ultrasonics, with a home brew unit and
a
well
powerful piezo tweeter you can tweak the tone and pulse rate to
perfection
so it literally drives the dog mad.

This should cause sufficient distress to the owner when they have to
have
it
put down that they think twice before getting another.


I found a posting I made elsewhere about the results of my microphone
based survey:

"Over a period of 20 days the dogs barked a total of
6685 times, an average of over 334 times a day. On one day the dogs
barked over one thousand times."

I doubt the owner of such dogs is going to notice any increase that
can
be
induced. As I noted ealier, the problem went away, but I think it's
naive
to suppose that owners can be driven having their pets put down.

They can if it goes mad and savages a family member.



If it attacks anyone unprovoked, the authorities will probably require
that it be put down, regardless of the owner's desire.

But I don't think ultransonic noise is going to have that outcome.

Anyone know the optimum dose of LSD per kg for a dog?

Ultrasonics is likely a lot cheaper than enough LSD to send a dog mad and
won't show up on autopsy/investigation - or get you arrested buying the
stuff. With homebrew kit you can tweak tone and pulse rate for best
effect.

Pulsed or warbling ultrasonic really will do a dog's head in, years ago
BT
took away our beloved red telephone box in my street and replaced it with
a
modern stainless-steel open plan phone kiosk, unfortunately they mounted
it
facing south-west - from where the wind always brings heavy rain. When
the
phone got wet it started emitting a high pitched whistling noise (no way
of
knowing whether it was also emitting ultrasonic) but when it was
whistling I
could hear dozens of dogs barking continuously in the surrounding houses.

Needless to say BT were persuaded to effect a remedy rather rapidly.

It may well be that such noises will provoke barking. I don't dispute
that. The question is whether they'll cause an attack on a human so as to
get the animal put down.

Like I said - use a well powerful piezo tweeter and tweak tone & pulse for
best effect.

 

[Sylvia Else]

On 29/05/2010 7:45 AM, ian field wrote:
On 28/05/2010 11:42 PM, ian field wrote:
On 28/05/2010 6:24 AM, ian field wrote:
On 27/05/2010 10:21 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 26/05/2010 6:25 AM, L.A.T. wrote:
Hi all, Is it legal to make and use an electronic device to stop
or
annoy
the hell out of a neighbours dog? I have a dog next to my
computer
room
I
would like to make a device that only the dog would hear and
make
it
silent. Is this possable? If its possable I need to know the
diagram,
etc,
to make myself or can you by them?

Thanks
GK
These devices seldom work as desired or as advertised.

I obtained one on approval. Totally useless. It certainly didn't
stop
the
dog from barking. Whether it annoyed the dog into barking more was
difficult to tell, since the dog barked pretty much continuously
anyway.

**What sort of device was it? I am aware of one type, that sprays
an
unpleasant, but harmless, chemical near the dog's nose, every time
it
barks.
I know of a couple of people who rented these devices and they
worked
perfectly. In one case, it only took a week. In the other case, it
took
two
weeks and the dog ceased barking. The other method I know of, but
have
serious misgivings about, is a surgical procedure where the dog is
'de-barked'. I've seen the results of that too.


The device emitted a very loud ultrasonic noise which was supposed
to
be
unpleasant to the dog. The theory is that the dog recognises the
link
between barking and the noise, and thus desists.

The device you're talking about has to be attached to the dog,
presumably
by its collar. There are also devices, that I've had good reports
on,
that
administer a mild electric shock when the dog barks (but
bleeding-hearts
got them banned in NSW[*]). However both such devices require the
cooperation of the owner, and such options are not available of the
owner
is indifferent, or actually oblivious.

I eventually set up a microphone and sound activated recording
software
and created a log which I sent to the council. Only then to learn
that
the
tenant was being evicted anyway.

[*] Apparently they are considered cruel, even though people have
tried
the devices on themselves, and the shock is no more than unpleasant.
And
the device is not as cruel as a brick through the dog's skull when
the
neighbour is not looking.

Sylvia.


I'd definately go with pulsed ultrasonics, with a home brew unit and
a
well
powerful piezo tweeter you can tweak the tone and pulse rate to
perfection
so it literally drives the dog mad.

This should cause sufficient distress to the owner when they have to
have
it
put down that they think twice before getting another.


I found a posting I made elsewhere about the results of my microphone
based survey:

"Over a period of 20 days the dogs barked a total of
6685 times, an average of over 334 times a day. On one day the dogs
barked over one thousand times."

I doubt the owner of such dogs is going to notice any increase that
can
be
induced. As I noted ealier, the problem went away, but I think it's
naive
to suppose that owners can be driven having their pets put down.

They can if it goes mad and savages a family member.



If it attacks anyone unprovoked, the authorities will probably require
that it be put down, regardless of the owner's desire.

But I don't think ultransonic noise is going to have that outcome.

Anyone know the optimum dose of LSD per kg for a dog?

Ultrasonics is likely a lot cheaper than enough LSD to send a dog mad and
won't show up on autopsy/investigation - or get you arrested buying the
stuff. With homebrew kit you can tweak tone and pulse rate for best
effect.

Pulsed or warbling ultrasonic really will do a dog's head in, years ago
BT
took away our beloved red telephone box in my street and replaced it with
a
modern stainless-steel open plan phone kiosk, unfortunately they mounted
it
facing south-west - from where the wind always brings heavy rain. When
the
phone got wet it started emitting a high pitched whistling noise (no way
of
knowing whether it was also emitting ultrasonic) but when it was
whistling I
could hear dozens of dogs barking continuously in the surrounding houses.

Needless to say BT were persuaded to effect a remedy rather rapidly.



It may well be that such noises will provoke barking. I don't dispute
that. The question is whether they'll cause an attack on a human so as to
get the animal put down.

Like I said - use a well powerful piezo tweeter and tweak tone& pulse for
best effect.

I notice the OP posted then disappeared ? a Troll?

Perhaps. But if so, a strange one.

Sylvia.