J
Jackie
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
What audio specifications would one expect from a Sony, 6 head Hi-Fi
VCR? (EZ725). Not in manual.
Jackie
VCR? (EZ725). Not in manual.
Jackie
amstereo-matt2 said:20 hz - 20'000 hz , 0.05 tdh @ 1 Khz, W&F i dot no, my panasonic is ~ 0.6%
W&F
either way, it is a stereo hi-fi track that as long as u dont use log play
will, have an all but perfect sound output. record a CD track to it and play
it back u'll be hard pressed to hear the difference.
Tony Pearce said:play it back u'll be hard pressed to hear the difference.
Possibly but you forgot to mention the wideband 2:1 compression/expansion
can cause artefacts,
as can the head switching.
residual stereo carrier in many units.
Definitely Not CD quality,
Rob Judd said:Phil,
Go take a cold shower.
but disbelieving the instruments goes beyond the pale. He's not claiming
golden ears here.
If you listen to everything through PC speakers, of course there's no
difference. But that neither makes you an expert nor gives you the right
to behave like the above.
I've heard every audio argument under the sun,
** Yes he is.
The same Pearce idiot has been posting absolute garbage on aus.hi-fi
simultaneously last night with the above message - hence my use of the
expletives.
Tony Pearce said:What is it?
No, just fact supported by measurements,
Where exactly?
The garbage is all yours, and the expletives are your normal style, as
thousands of posts on Google show.
As usual you disagree but provide no evidence ....
Tony Pearce said:93 dB SNR, > 0.001% THD? Show me the measurements.
Tony Pearce said:news:[email protected]...
So where are yours?
valid.
93 dB SNR, > 0.001% THD? Show me the measurements.
Where *approximately* did I say I had golden ears?
Of anything.
Tony Pearce said:That should be greater than 93 dB SNR, and less than 0.001% THD for CD, but
not for Hi-Fi VCR.
His claims are wrong ......
You really have to learn to ignore Phyllis.
month perpetually.She gets this type of PMT at the drop of a hat - must be that time of the
She thinks she's the Roddles of aus.electronics.
time.The key difference is that Roddles knows what he's on about most of the
** Go look it up - it is NOT 2:1.
** You made the claim so the onus is on you to support it with facts and
reasoning.
** The phrase was "CD level sound quality" - you have no clue what
that means if you think the specs must match.
So tell us what it is, and why no compression/expansion artifacts will
exist?
and> reasoning.
Just like you do (NOT!
You wouldn't know a fact if it bit you Phil, and would not admit you're
wrong no matter what facts are posted. So why would I waste my time trying
to convince you?
Your right! But the Original phrase you responded to was "Not CD quality"
if that makes any difference.
If they are inferior, how can it be called "CD quality".
Phil said:** Dunno where your figures come from - some budget priced Chinese POS
??
IME ( with an early Philips Hi-Fi VCR ) the dynamic range was around 85
dB , response 20 Hz to 20 kHz +/- 1 db , THD typically 0.05 % at full
level , W&F less than 0.005 % rms.
Easily good enough to dub any CD onto with no audible loss.
Nakamichi cassette recordings ( Dolby C etc) had very obvious
deterioration on the same CD programme material as was tried with the hi-fi
VCR.