William Sommerwerck said:
"N_Cook" wrote in message
Why should they be identical to the eye? The eye is less sensitive to red and
blue than green. And red and blue wavelengths cover a narrower part of the
spectrum than green, so less visible light gets through.
http://thelawlers.com/Blognosticator/?p=104
http://photo.net/filters-bags-tripods-accessories-forum/00WUUM
For both makes, completely different sizes etc, the transmissivity , by eye,
of the blue sector matches the green sector .
This projector is used for graphical displays and red indistinguishable from
black at the usual diagonal is a problem. Cleaning the UV filter at the C/W
and cleaning the surfaces of the integrator tunnel has improved things a bit
but not enough. Orange or pink would probably be alright for this use
instead of red but dark brown or dark plum is not.
I just tried a scrapped dichroic C/W and it is quite easy to scrape lines in
the coating , say 10 percent , to pass something more like an orange colour.
Anyone ever done this to get round underpowered lamp problem and red/brown
issue? Would heat build up from the multiple scratches compared to just the
3 butt joins of the glass sectors , as made
Why dichroic for primary colours transmission and reflection of the
complement. In dichroic lamp reflectiors I can see a point in that it
reflects the visible light and transmits the heat through the glass to be
delt with by fans.
I cannot see that reflecting the complement is a by-product of reflecting IR
or UV back to the lamp.