Maker Pro
Maker Pro

is led driver ok?

docb

Feb 11, 2010
131
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
131
I want to add a photoresistor to this common LED driver circuit.
Is this circuit change ok?

Any issue with the photocell having too much current through it?

thanks





Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 

(*steve*)

¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥd
Moderator
Jan 21, 2010
25,510
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
25,510
hahaha, yeah, heaps.

You would be very lucky to find a photocell with a range of resistance suited to this (i.e. minimum resistance in the tenths of ohms)
 

docb

Feb 11, 2010
131
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
131
hahaha, yeah, heaps.

You would be very lucky to find a photocell with a range of resistance suited to this (i.e. minimum resistance in the tenths of ohms)

I think I need about 75ma, so just a 1/10th watt resistor, at 17ohms.

Which part if this plan is a problem? Is it that photocells all are way out of this range?
An alternate way to do this?
 
Last edited:

(*steve*)

¡sǝpodᴉʇuɐ ǝɥʇ ɹɐǝɥd
Moderator
Jan 21, 2010
25,510
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
25,510
well, you show a 3W LED, if you assume it's 1A (ish) at full power then the resistance you need to drop 1.25V is 1.25 ohms (Sorry, for some reason I was thinking it was 3A across 0.6V)

In any case, your typical photo-resistor has a resistance of several hundreds to a few thousand ohms in bright light, raising to several hundred thousand ohms in darkness.

I'm pretty sure your circuit wouldn't be too effective. It would either have the LED too dim in daylight, or too bright in darkness.

However if you have a particular photo resistor in mind, and know both its resistance, and the LED current you require in bright light and darkness, it is possible to calculate if it is possible to achieve them. I remain sceptical.

Without such measurements it is simply impossible to say. Even if it is possible to get 2 points right, there is no guarantee that the intermediate values would be acceptable (although this is probably less of an issue).
 

docb

Feb 11, 2010
131
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
131
Any suggestions for a photo cell that has as low a resistance as possible when exposed to light?

The ones I saw all stayed rather high, but closer to 50ohms would be nice.
 

Zander

Sep 11, 2010
19
Joined
Sep 11, 2010
Messages
19
Any suggestions for a photo cell that has as low a resistance as possible when exposed to light?

The ones I saw all stayed rather high, but closer to 50ohms would be nice.

Try

http://www.mouser.com/search/Default.aspx


Figure out it's lowest resistance as it stands, and then put a resistor in series with it that gives you your desired resistance.

If you want to get a lower resistance, I think you have to put a resistor parallel to the photo cell.

Are you making a light meter? I have a book that has nice light meter circuit in it.
 

docb

Feb 11, 2010
131
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
131
If you want to get a lower resistance, I think you have to put a resistor parallel to the photo cell.

If the psr has a resistance of say 1k minimum. and I need to see 100ish, added a resistor in parallel will not give me much range at all.

100+psr at 1k = 90.909
100+psr at 5k = 98.039
100+psr at 50k = 99.8

See why this won't work?
 
Top