R
Ross Herbert
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Yup, it should be 2/4 terminal. Somebody makes some sorta-affordable
Kelvin clips. I'll try to find the source.
John
RG58U or similar small gauge coax makes a pretty good diy kelvin lead.
Yup, it should be 2/4 terminal. Somebody makes some sorta-affordable
Kelvin clips. I'll try to find the source.
John
Yes.
David said:Mueller does:
http://www.muellerelectric.com/kelvin_clips.html
Note, the big "Check Inventory" buttons on that page
don't work, but the box on the right does.
Winfield said:The first clip has far too weak a spring, not even
strong enough to hold against the pull of its cable,
One solution is to find a good quality alligator
clip, one that works well in various circumstances
(happily one of the very common types works well),
and rebuild its hinge to insulate the two grippers.
Excuse me for butting in to this very interesting discussion!One solution is to find a good quality alligator
clip, one that works well in various circumstances
(happily one of the very common types works well),
and rebuild its hinge to insulate the two grippers.
Joel Kolstad said:Hmm... wouldn't replacing the spring on the far-too-weak-spring clips be
easier?
I have one of these: http://www.m3electronix.com/lcr.html ...and it works
pretty well. It's not specifically designed for ESR, though -- it's a
general-purpose impedance meter at a half-dozen or so frequencies.
---Joel
Since lots of single-chip uPs include decent adc's these days, why not
just digitize the voltage drop across the cap? One could then note the
cap charging slope and untangle it from the true esr. And measure
capacitance, for free.
10 ohms would be a practical upper limit for anything I
would need.
Up to this point, I would be happy with an analog movement
with a logarithmic scale.
Could we say 200 mV peak to peak, open circuit, from a 10
ohm source?
That's what the Bob Parker meter is. A Z8, I think.
Homemade slope ADC.
Hey, John, did you happen to look at applying the AD5933 in this kind
of application? It's not a super good fit perhaps, but a lot of stuff
in 16 pins for the dollars.
Hmm... wouldn't replacing the spring on the far-too-weak-
spring clips be easier?
I have one of these:http://www.m3electronix.com/lcr.html...and it works
pretty well. It's not specifically designed for ESR, though -- it's a
general-purpose impedance meter at a half-dozen or so frequencies.
Winfield Hill said:Are you referring to their Kelvin clip, what's the link?
Done something similar some time ago, to save some flash space for bitsream
on a relatively small micro.
Check this thread on this newsgroup:
http://tinyurl.com/2xkt52
or search with google groups for "compressing Xilinx bitstreams, some test
data".
There are some measures from my real design, and a link to the source code.
Please share your results with the group!
John said:[1] statistical analysis of some FPGA configuration patterns, leading
up to a fast, small compression/decompression algorithm. We need to
fit an application program and 6 megabits of Xilinx config stuff into
a 4 mbit Eprom.
I wrote the following two small C programs in 2001 for an Altera FPGA. You
can't get it much simpler, and from a whole bunch of config files it gets
about a 50% compression factor (plus or minus 15%).
You may need to set the 'most-common value' from 0x00 to 0xff - I don't have
a lot of Xilinx bitstreams here to check what's best.
You could actually check the 'golden' bitstream to count which byte value
occurs the most...
Good luck!
Ben
Mark said:Hmm, just to keep someone from plagarizing it,
<ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/m/mzenier/esrmeter.gif>
Hmm, just to keep someone from plagarizing it,
<ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/m/mzenier/esrmeter.gif>
A 30 kHz "ohmmeter" that I did 8-10 years ago.
Use one of the spare 4049s
POT
!\ 100K 0.1 1N914
U1-11 -----! >O---/\/---!!----+---->!---- Top of xformer
!/ !
---
^
!
GND
With the leads open, adjust the 100K for no deflection on the meter.
Spehro said:On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:06:40 -0500, Spehro Pefhany
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:07:11 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
Fred Bloggs wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
Fred Bloggs wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
That's about right, but it's still going to be simpler than
most of the goofy and truly terrible "esr" meters we've seen
here lately. You may as well measure leakage and dielectric
absorption while you're at it; code is cheap.
Granted they are amateurish junk, but your designs and ideas
are so *ugly* they are borderline grotesque. When you have
something artful to suggest that will be the day....
You don't approve of my products? Show us some of yours.
As they say, I don't have to be a chef to know the food stinks...
Show us something you've designed.
You show us an esr meter that doesn't require a VMX crate.
I suggest we have an esr-meter design contest. However, to
make it usenet friendly, and accessible to the readers, all
entries must be made in ASCII drawings, annotated with text.
Why not make it a group project, for real? I'd be willing to do the
first cut at schematic and algorithms. What we really need is someone
to hack the real code; I hate to program, and I'm going to do it most
of the weekend likely [1], so I'm not going to volunteer for that
part!
I'll volunteer, on provision that you, and anyone else contemplating a
serious contribution, read a few things so as to understand the
problem domain (testing, and in particular in-circuit testing of
e-caps) better.
It looks logical that it would be your task to do that research and
post a concise summary of requirements.
John
Well, the problem is that there's a dichotomy (or maybe a trichotomy)
in the wish lists.
First we have the service tech's unit:
- range up to 10 or 100 ohms with 0.01 resolution
- measurement frequency the equivalent of 100kHz
- no need to distinguish between impedance and ESR
- accuracy is of little importance, 10% is more than good enough,
we are looking for order of magnitude changes
- must be able to measure in-circuit, and preferably without
concern about polarity, so voltage should be low (say < 200mV) and
current should be 50-100mA RMS maximum.
- two wire probe is probably all that's practical, we have to beat
the convenience of tacking a known-good cap across the part and
trying it out
- it's reasonable to expect the meter to survive connection to a large
capacitor charged to ~400VDC without complaint
- should be simple/cheap/reliable/rugged and easy to use
- a "Pike" model is possible that would analyze the cap and deliver
a go/no-go indication (or possibly two for low-Z and regular caps)
- 0.001 ohm resolution
- reasonable accuracy (say 1% or better)
- must measure actual ESR
- able to measure relatively low value ceramic caps as well
as e-caps
- Kelvin measurement
- variable frequency measurement (maybe 100Hz to 1MHz)
- milliohmmeter for inductors
- no need for in-circuit but should not be damaged by cap
charged to ~50V
- reasonable cost
and hey, if we're dreaming
- complex and real impedance of inductors, resistors and caps over
that range
- ditto with DC bias on capacitors 0-10V and current on inductors
0-2A