T
TokaMundo
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people.
The formulas are functions of wire diameter, wire resistivity and
frequency, and do not lose validity merely because a thick wire has AC
resistance greater than DC resistance at a frequency that is easy to label
"NOT high".
I'm not a son, you illiterate and uncouth obscurantist troll. I
already used reason in the proof, which you wilfully ignore. It uses
maths too, which puts a limiting case on the Lorentz corrections,
remembering that GR and QM are incompatible. It looks like my other
replier didn't read it too or he would be forced to agree with me. The
people here are retards.
Stop swearing or I'll beat your head in, the part that causes swearing.
You can't prove anything. You're wrong in everything.
I'm not a son, you illiterate and uncouth obscurantist troll. I
already used reason in the proof, which you wilfully ignore. It uses
maths too, which puts a limiting case on the Lorentz corrections,
remembering that GR and QM are incompatible. It looks like my other
replier didn't read it too or he would be forced to agree with me. The
people here are retards.
There are stupid questions, those that could be easily found on one's
own.
Stop swearing or I'll beat your head in, the part that causes swearing.
Sometimes I find it hard to believe that we actually call ourselves
sentient beings with the way some of you act.
Hey, you lysdexic dufus! I was on your side!
Since a thin round copper wire has a very low emissivity it wont
give up its heat all that fast.
This will mean that your thermal
gradient won't be as prevalent as you suggest. The proof is when one
takes a copper wire and places it across a battery's terminals.
Notice how the entire wire turns a nice cherry red quite evenly, all
the way up to where it is attached to any form of sinking element.
The current throughout the wire will be even,
and it is that current
which generates the heat, or more precisely, the resistance to said
current flow.
If the wire were giving up its heat real fast, like that of a finned
heat sink with air passing over it, I might agree.
In the case of
bare copper, however, the temperature throughout the wire is going to
be very even. Your gradient will be nearly undetectable.
For a very large diameter copper bus, it MIGHT have a slight
gradient between the center and the outer surface, but not much. For
wire, it is as even as even gets.
Not so. I could show you several switchyards within a short drive that use
many hollow tube conductors all over the yard.
daestrom
TokaMundo said:The table I saw shows the AC and DC resistance as being exactly the
same for both.
Your flaw is where you failed to note the topic given in the CRC
handbook.
60 Hz is NOT high frequency... at all.
Try some calculations at 100 kHz and you'll see that those
frequencies down near zero (ie 60Hz) yield very nearly nil difference.
TokaMundo said:Yours certainly contributed absofuckinglutely nothing, and would
certainly fall into the "stupid answer" category.
You remind me of a Firesign Theatre quote:
"Who wona second world war.. you so smart?"
Perhaps, if you are so informed, you should try giving an answer
that actually has facts in it that are in sync with the topic of the
thread, not merely its title.
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 01:20:29 GMT, TokaMundo
Yet another retarded post by Johnny boy.Autymn and Tokey up a tree,
k-i-s-s-i-n-g
Now _there's_ a match made in heaven, lol...
TokaMundo said:As if declaring that someone has "no practical knowledge" isn't a
personal attack.
**** off retard. You have social problems.