Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Water for Gas conversion hoax/scam?

P

Paul E. Schoen

Jan 1, 1970
0
A friend just showed me an instruction package for a conversion kit to
allow a car engine to run on hydrogen and oxygen extracted from water. He
paid about $60 for the privilege of downloading and printing out over 100
pages of text and crude drawings and schematics. I looked through it, and
it appears to be a scam, but I was unable to find any serious discussion
on-line (nothing on snopes) to indicate that it cannot possibly work as it
claims. My arguments are as follows:

1. It should require at least as much energy to dissociate the hydrogen and
oxygen atoms from water as could be regained by combustion, so unless the
gases are generated from the power grid and then used in the vehicle, the
energy ultimately must come from the gasoline engine.

2. The instructions call for a carburetor conversion kit. My last vehicle
with a carburetor was a 1986 model. I do not see how the introduction of a
hydrogen/oxygen mixture to the manifold can work with a fuel-injected
system, especially when it is controlled by a computer as most vehicles
have had since about 1995.

3. The electronic circuits you are expected to build are designed with old
technology parts, such as a 555 timer, 2N3055 transistor, CD4069, LM741,
etc, and operate at frequencies from about 10 Hz to 350 kHz, with no
instruction on PCB layout. These circuits are basically variable frequency
PWM generators, with one set of pulses to electrodes in the water, and
another set that go to a toroidal transformer.

4. The toroidal transformer has a ferrite core and is to be hand wound with
about 2000 turns of special teflon-coated magnet wire. Its purpose, as I
understand it, is to somehow use magnetism to align the water molecules and
dissociate the hydrogen and oxygen.

5. There is also some reference to a "water capacitor", whatever that is,
and somehow this 12 VDC circuit generates thousands of volts.

6. The instructions are so extensive and complicated, and the illustrations
are so poor, that I cannot imagine anyone actually going through all the
steps and completing the project successfully. That is also a convenient
way to make it always possible to tell someone they disn't follow the
instructions exactly, if the thing doesn't work.

7. As far as I can tell, there is no way to regulate the pressure of the
H-O mixture (also known as Browns Gas), or to maintain a sufficient reserve
for long-term power, and I cannot imagine a small generator like this being
capable of providing enough gas continuously for automotive use. If it
could, and the source of the power for hydrogen generation is the battery,
I'm sure it would be overloaded or quickly discharged.

I thought I saw a post about this sometime back, but all I found was an
"ad" in SEB.

My friend is going to try to get his money back through his credit card
company. I doubt if he will have any success at that. He would probably
have to first invest the time and materials to actually build the device,
and then (if he could prove he did everything exactly right), maybe he
could have a case. But he paid for an instruction manual, and he got one.

Paul
 
M

Martin Griffith

Jan 1, 1970
0
A friend just showed me an instruction package for a conversion kit to
allow a car engine to run on hydrogen and oxygen extracted from water. He
paid about $60 for the privilege of downloading and printing out over 100
pages of text and crude drawings and schematics. I looked through it, and
it appears to be a scam, but I was unable to find any serious discussion
on-line (nothing on snopes) to indicate that it cannot possibly work as it
claims. My arguments are as follows:

snip

Make a bit torrent of the files so people can download this scam free
of charge.


martin
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Paul said:
A friend just showed me an instruction package for a conversion kit to
allow a car engine to run on hydrogen and oxygen extracted from water. He
paid about $60 for the privilege of downloading and printing out over 100
pages of text and crude drawings and schematics. I looked through it, and
it appears to be a scam, but I was unable to find any serious discussion
on-line (nothing on snopes) to indicate that it cannot possibly work as it
claims. My arguments are as follows:

1. It should require at least as much energy to dissociate the hydrogen and
oxygen atoms from water as could be regained by combustion, so unless the
gases are generated from the power grid and then used in the vehicle, the
energy ultimately must come from the gasoline engine.

2. The instructions call for a carburetor conversion kit. My last vehicle
with a carburetor was a 1986 model. I do not see how the introduction of a
hydrogen/oxygen mixture to the manifold can work with a fuel-injected
system, especially when it is controlled by a computer as most vehicles
have had since about 1995.

3. The electronic circuits you are expected to build are designed with old
technology parts, such as a 555 timer, 2N3055 transistor, CD4069, LM741,
etc, and operate at frequencies from about 10 Hz to 350 kHz, with no
instruction on PCB layout. These circuits are basically variable frequency
PWM generators, with one set of pulses to electrodes in the water, and
another set that go to a toroidal transformer.

4. The toroidal transformer has a ferrite core and is to be hand wound with
about 2000 turns of special teflon-coated magnet wire. Its purpose, as I
understand it, is to somehow use magnetism to align the water molecules and
dissociate the hydrogen and oxygen.

5. There is also some reference to a "water capacitor", whatever that is,
and somehow this 12 VDC circuit generates thousands of volts.

6. The instructions are so extensive and complicated, and the illustrations
are so poor, that I cannot imagine anyone actually going through all the
steps and completing the project successfully. That is also a convenient
way to make it always possible to tell someone they disn't follow the
instructions exactly, if the thing doesn't work.

7. As far as I can tell, there is no way to regulate the pressure of the
H-O mixture (also known as Browns Gas), or to maintain a sufficient reserve
for long-term power, and I cannot imagine a small generator like this being
capable of providing enough gas continuously for automotive use. If it
could, and the source of the power for hydrogen generation is the battery,
I'm sure it would be overloaded or quickly discharged.

I thought I saw a post about this sometime back, but all I found was an
"ad" in SEB.

My friend is going to try to get his money back through his credit card
company. I doubt if he will have any success at that. He would probably
have to first invest the time and materials to actually build the device,
and then (if he could prove he did everything exactly right), maybe he
could have a case. But he paid for an instruction manual, and he got one.

Probably a new story, same as the old story:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer
 
A friend just showed me an instruction package for a conversion kit to
allow a car engine to run on hydrogen and oxygen extracted from water. He
paid about $60 for the privilege of downloading and printing out over 100
pages of text and crude drawings and schematics. I looked through it, and
it appears to be a scam, but I was unable to find any serious discussion
on-line (nothing on snopes) to indicate that it cannot possibly work as it
claims. My arguments are as follows:

1. It should require at least as much energy to dissociate the hydrogen and
oxygen atoms from water as could be regained by combustion, so unless the
gases are generated from the power grid and then used in the vehicle, the
energy ultimately must come from the gasoline engine.

2. The instructions call for a carburetor conversion kit. My last vehicle
with a carburetor was a 1986 model. I do not see how the introduction of a
hydrogen/oxygen mixture to the manifold can work with a fuel-injected
system, especially when it is controlled by a computer as most vehicles
have had since about 1995.

3. The electronic circuits you are expected to build are designed with old
technology parts, such as a 555 timer, 2N3055 transistor, CD4069, LM741,
etc, and operate at frequencies from about 10 Hz to 350 kHz, with no
instruction on PCB layout. These circuits are basically variable frequency
PWM generators, with one set of pulses to electrodes in the water, and
another set that go to a toroidal transformer.

4. The toroidal transformer has a ferrite core and is to be hand wound with
about 2000 turns of special teflon-coated magnet wire. Its purpose, as I
understand it, is to somehow use magnetism to align the water molecules and
dissociate the hydrogen and oxygen.

5. There is also some reference to a "water capacitor", whatever that is,
and somehow this 12 VDC circuit generates thousands of volts.

6. The instructions are so extensive and complicated, and the illustrations
are so poor, that I cannot imagine anyone actually going through all the
steps and completing the project successfully. That is also a convenient
way to make it always possible to tell someone they disn't follow the
instructions exactly, if the thing doesn't work.

7. As far as I can tell, there is no way to regulate the pressure of the
H-O mixture (also known as Browns Gas), or to maintain a sufficient reserve
for long-term power, and I cannot imagine a small generator like this being
capable of providing enough gas continuously for automotive use. If it
could, and the source of the power for hydrogen generation is the battery,
I'm sure it would be overloaded or quickly discharged.

I thought I saw a post about this sometime back, but all I found was an
"ad" in SEB.

My friend is going to try to get his money back through his credit card
company. I doubt if he will have any success at that. He would probably
have to first invest the time and materials to actually build the device,
and then (if he could prove he did everything exactly right), maybe he
could have a case. But he paid for an instruction manual, and he got one.

Paul

mythbusters tried it: http://mythbustersresults.com/episode53

-Lasse
 
I

ian field

Jan 1, 1970
0
Paul E. Schoen said:
A friend just showed me an instruction package for a conversion kit to
allow a car engine to run on hydrogen and oxygen extracted from water. He
paid about $60 for the privilege of downloading and printing out over 100
pages of text and crude drawings and schematics.

<snip>

Its reassuring that this crook is conning the gullible instead of burgling
me.
 
J

James Arthur

Jan 1, 1970
0
Dave said:
I believe that this sort of thing has been floating around for
decades... it's the sort of "innovation" that used to be offered via
small classified ads in the back of popular magazines. Possibly it
still is.


Almost correct. It will require *more* energy to dissociate the
gasses than you will reclaim by burning them. 100% efficiency is
impossible.

If you try to use the vehicle's alternator to produce enough
electricity to dissociate enough water to run the engine and drive the
alternator... it just won't work.


Sounds like snake-oil to me.

The transformer is probably just intended to step up the voltage
created by the PWM, in order to get enough voltage to dissociate the
water. Ferrite-loading the transformer will increase the inductance,
and reduce the number of turns of wire necessary. The reduction in
wire length will come along with a reduction in resistive losses in
the transformer, and make the whole system's efficiency a bit less bad.


In principle, you could use *extremely* pure water as the dielectric
in a capacitor (between two plates). In practice, any real water
you'd be likely to be able to use would have a high enough
conductivity that it would render the cap rather useless.


Odds are, the guy selling the plans has never actually attempted to
build it, either.


He also paid for an instructive lesson in early detection of
snake-oil, and I'd say that he probably got his money's worth.


Ironically, it turns out that snake oil's good stuff. It's
a potent source omega-3 fatty acids, and useful for many
of the conditions it was touted for: heart disease,
inflammation, arthritis, certain cancers...

Just make sure you're getting the real thing, not some
shabby snake-oil substitute. ;-0

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
P

PeterD

Jan 1, 1970
0
A friend just showed me an instruction package for a conversion kit to
allow a car engine to run on hydrogen and oxygen extracted from water. He
paid about $60 for the privilege of downloading

and you are proudly admiting to having friends this *dumb*?
 
P

Paul E. Schoen

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim Thompson said:
Obama believes it will work ;-)

Hey, you're talkin' about my man, there. When he succeeds at uniting the
country, we will have an Obama-nation!

Paul
 
P

Paul E. Schoen

Jan 1, 1970
0
James Arthur said:
Ironically, it turns out that snake oil's good stuff. It's
a potent source omega-3 fatty acids, and useful for many
of the conditions it was touted for: heart disease,
inflammation, arthritis, certain cancers...

Just make sure you're getting the real thing, not some
shabby snake-oil substitute. ;-0

So, snakes are not poisonous, after all! But some are venomous, and even
they are delicious and nutritious.

Paul
 
P

Paul E. Schoen

Jan 1, 1970
0
PeterD said:
and you are proudly admiting to having friends this *dumb*?

He's actually a brilliant mechanical designer, as evidenced by the products
he has made for diving (see www.patcoinc.com), so I was surprised that he
actually seemed serious about this thing. But I think the dumbest thing he
said was that he thinks it will be no problem getting his money back from
his credit card company when he complains about it.

If he was so concerned about fuel economy, he should have bought a 40 MPG
Saturn like I just did.

Paul
 
I

ian field

Jan 1, 1970
0
Paul E. Schoen said:
He's actually a brilliant mechanical designer, as evidenced by the
products he has made for diving (see www.patcoinc.com), so I was surprised
that he actually seemed serious about this thing. But I think the dumbest
thing he said was that he thinks it will be no problem getting his money
back from his credit card company when he complains about it.

If he was so concerned about fuel economy, he should have bought a 40 MPG
Saturn like I just did.

Paul

Those "Tuk-tuk" 3-wheel things they use in Asia do 100MPG.
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
ian said:
Those "Tuk-tuk" 3-wheel things they use in Asia do 100MPG.

Clever engineers were able to design stuff like that 60 years ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_KR200

Even my old Citroen (pre-WWII engine design) yielded 50mpg. Maybe
"modern" automotive designers should talk to the old hands before the
last one has passed away. Seems academia ain't the place to learn this
stuff.
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim said:
ian said:
news:[email protected]... [snip]
Those "Tuk-tuk" 3-wheel things they use in Asia do 100MPG.
Clever engineers were able to design stuff like that 60 years ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_KR200

Even my old Citroen (pre-WWII engine design) yielded 50mpg. Maybe
"modern" automotive designers should talk to the old hands before the
last one has passed away. Seems academia ain't the place to learn this
stuff.

Neither can survive a collision with a dog ;-)

Crash worthiness wasn't a concern when these vehicles were designed. But
it can be achieved with some more clever engineering. The automotive
engineers back in those days sure were smart people.
 
D

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax

Jan 1, 1970
0
Joerg said:
Clever engineers were able to design stuff like that 60 years ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_KR200

Even my old Citroen (pre-WWII engine design) yielded 50mpg. Maybe
"modern" automotive designers should talk to the old hands before the
last one has passed away. Seems academia ain't the place to learn this
stuff.

My 1984 2.0L Capri did 37 mpg
 
D

Dirk Bruere at NeoPax

Jan 1, 1970
0
Joerg said:
Jim said:
ian field wrote:
news:[email protected]... [snip]
Those "Tuk-tuk" 3-wheel things they use in Asia do 100MPG.
Clever engineers were able to design stuff like that 60 years ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_KR200

Even my old Citroen (pre-WWII engine design) yielded 50mpg. Maybe
"modern" automotive designers should talk to the old hands before the
last one has passed away. Seems academia ain't the place to learn
this stuff.

Neither can survive a collision with a dog ;-)

Crash worthiness wasn't a concern when these vehicles were designed. But
it can be achieved with some more clever engineering. The automotive
engineers back in those days sure were smart people.

Ditto aerospace engineers.
Hypersonic aircraft in the 1950s etc...
 
M

Martin Griffith

Jan 1, 1970
0
Jim said:
ian field wrote:
news:[email protected]... [snip]
Those "Tuk-tuk" 3-wheel things they use in Asia do 100MPG.

Clever engineers were able to design stuff like that 60 years ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_KR200

Even my old Citroen (pre-WWII engine design) yielded 50mpg. Maybe
"modern" automotive designers should talk to the old hands before the
last one has passed away. Seems academia ain't the place to learn this
stuff.

Neither can survive a collision with a dog ;-)

Crash worthiness wasn't a concern when these vehicles were designed. But
it can be achieved with some more clever engineering. The automotive
engineers back in those days sure were smart people.

I suppose you "still " can't see youtube stuff :(
but this is a nice bit of crash testing


martin
 
J

Joerg

Jan 1, 1970
0
Martin said:
Jim said:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:38:19 -0700, Joerg

ian field wrote:
[snip]
Those "Tuk-tuk" 3-wheel things they use in Asia do 100MPG.

Clever engineers were able to design stuff like that 60 years ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_KR200

Even my old Citroen (pre-WWII engine design) yielded 50mpg. Maybe
"modern" automotive designers should talk to the old hands before the
last one has passed away. Seems academia ain't the place to learn this
stuff.
Neither can survive a collision with a dog ;-)
Crash worthiness wasn't a concern when these vehicles were designed. But
it can be achieved with some more clever engineering. The automotive
engineers back in those days sure were smart people.

I suppose you "still " can't see youtube stuff :(
but this is a nice bit of crash testing

Actually, since about five minutes I can! What a coincidence.

Pretty brutal crash. IIRC they did a similar one on a Smart here in the
US and now you can see the first Smarts here. BTW that old Citroen
tended to hold up pretty well in crashes sind it's got a regular box frame.
 
I

ian field

Jan 1, 1970
0
Spehro Pefhany said:
Are those bloody Southeast Asian things two-strokes or what? I never
looked closely, but there's one heckuva lot of blue smoke.

Probably - a sort of Indian Trabant.
 

neon

Oct 21, 2006
1,325
Joined
Oct 21, 2006
Messages
1,325
Paul E. Schoen said:
A friend just showed me an instruction package for a conversion kit to
allow a car engine to run on hydrogen and oxygen extracted from water. He
paid about $60 for the privilege of downloading and printing out over 100
pages of text and crude drawings and schematics. I looked through it, and
it appears to be a scam, but I was unable to find any serious discussion
on-line (nothing on snopes) to indicate that it cannot possibly work as it
claims. My arguments are as follows:

1. It should require at least as much energy to dissociate the hydrogen and
oxygen atoms from water as could be regained by combustion, so unless the
gases are generated from the power grid and then used in the vehicle, the
energy ultimately must come from the gasoline engine.

2. The instructions call for a carburetor conversion kit. My last vehicle
with a carburetor was a 1986 model. I do not see how the introduction of a
hydrogen/oxygen mixture to the manifold can work with a fuel-injected
system, especially when it is controlled by a computer as most vehicles
have had since about 1995.

3. The electronic circuits you are expected to build are designed with old
technology parts, such as a 555 timer, 2N3055 transistor, CD4069, LM741,
etc, and operate at frequencies from about 10 Hz to 350 kHz, with no
instruction on PCB layout. These circuits are basically variable frequency
PWM generators, with one set of pulses to electrodes in the water, and
another set that go to a toroidal transformer.

4. The toroidal transformer has a ferrite core and is to be hand wound with
about 2000 turns of special teflon-coated magnet wire. Its purpose, as I
understand it, is to somehow use magnetism to align the water molecules and
dissociate the hydrogen and oxygen.

5. There is also some reference to a "water capacitor", whatever that is,
and somehow this 12 VDC circuit generates thousands of volts.

6. The instructions are so extensive and complicated, and the illustrations
are so poor, that I cannot imagine anyone actually going through all the
steps and completing the project successfully. That is also a convenient
way to make it always possible to tell someone they disn't follow the
instructions exactly, if the thing doesn't work.

7. As far as I can tell, there is no way to regulate the pressure of the
H-O mixture (also known as Browns Gas), or to maintain a sufficient reserve
for long-term power, and I cannot imagine a small generator like this being
capable of providing enough gas continuously for automotive use. If it
could, and the source of the power for hydrogen generation is the battery,
I'm sure it would be overloaded or quickly discharged.

I thought I saw a post about this sometime back, but all I found was an
"ad" in SEB.

My friend is going to try to get his money back through his credit card
company. I doubt if he will have any success at that. He would probably
have to first invest the time and materials to actually build the device,
and then (if he could prove he did everything exactly right), maybe he
could have a case. But he paid for an instruction manual, and he got one.

Paul
GREED WAS YOUR FRIEND DOWNFALL. get something from nothing.
 
R

Richard Henry

Jan 1, 1970
0
A friend just showed me an instruction package for a conversion kit to
allow a car engine to run on hydrogen and oxygen extracted from water. He
paid about $60 for the privilege of downloading and printing out over 100
pages of text and crude drawings and schematics. I looked through it, and
it appears to be a scam, but I was unable to find any serious discussion
on-line (nothing on snopes) to indicate that it cannot possibly work as it
claims. My arguments are as follows:

1. It should require at least as much energy to dissociate the hydrogen and
oxygen atoms from water as could be regained by combustion, so unless the
gases are generated from the power grid and then used in the vehicle, the
energy ultimately must come from the gasoline engine.

2. The instructions call for a carburetor conversion kit. My last vehicle
with a carburetor was a 1986 model. I do not see how the introduction of a
hydrogen/oxygen mixture to the manifold can work with a fuel-injected
system, especially when it is controlled by a computer as most vehicles
have had since about 1995.

3. The electronic circuits you are expected to build are designed with old
technology parts, such as a 555 timer, 2N3055 transistor, CD4069, LM741,
etc, and operate at frequencies from about 10 Hz to 350 kHz, with no
instruction on PCB layout. These circuits are basically variable frequency
PWM generators, with one set of pulses to electrodes in the water, and
another set that go to a toroidal transformer.

4. The toroidal transformer has a ferrite core and is to be hand wound with
about 2000 turns of special teflon-coated magnet wire. Its purpose, as I
understand it, is to somehow use magnetism to align the water molecules and
dissociate the hydrogen and oxygen.

5. There is also some reference to a "water capacitor", whatever that is,
and somehow this 12 VDC circuit generates thousands of volts.

6. The instructions are so extensive and complicated, and the illustrations
are so poor, that I cannot imagine anyone actually going through all the
steps and completing the project successfully. That is also a convenient
way to make it always possible to tell someone they disn't follow the
instructions exactly, if the thing doesn't work.

7. As far as I can tell, there is no way to regulate the pressure of the
H-O mixture (also known as Browns Gas), or to maintain a sufficient reserve
for long-term power, and I cannot imagine a small generator like this being
capable of providing enough gas continuously for automotive use. If it
could, and the source of the power for hydrogen generation is the battery,
I'm sure it would be overloaded or quickly discharged.

I thought I saw a post about this sometime back, but all I found was an
"ad" in SEB.

My friend is going to try to get his money back through his credit card
company. I doubt if he will have any success at that. He would probably
have to first invest the time and materials to actually build the device,
and then (if he could prove he did everything exactly right), maybe he
could have a case. But he paid for an instruction manual, and he got one.

Since your friend sent in his money, the device is working exactly as
the inventor intended.
 
Top