W
Winfield Hill
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
Adam S wrote...
I'm speculating that there are two possible reasons. First, it's
common to implement complex CMOS circuits with dynamic rather than
static circuitry, because it takes fewer MOS transistors. In such
a case, there will be a minimum operating frequency, although you
may go below that if you're below the maximum temperature spec.
The same should go for the charge on node capacitors leaking away.
Second, some delta sigma modulators have internal integrators that
have voltages that increase with time, and a maximum clock period
has to be specified to keep them from overflowing.
There are lots of cheap high-resolution low-frequency delta-sigma
ICs available, aimed at scales, geo-electronics, process industry
and other markets. Why make an awkward use of an audio IC.
Why do nearly all audio ADCs and CODECs have a minimum sample rate
specification ? I'd would like use a low cost 24bit audio ADCs and
interface to a microcontroller (SPI) at low sample rates < 4kHz.
Texas Instruments PCM**** range of audio ADCs typically have minimum
Fs of 16kHz. What happens at lower frequencies ? , does the logic stop
working, or is it something to do with capacitor charge loss in the
delta sigma modulator ?
I'm speculating that there are two possible reasons. First, it's
common to implement complex CMOS circuits with dynamic rather than
static circuitry, because it takes fewer MOS transistors. In such
a case, there will be a minimum operating frequency, although you
may go below that if you're below the maximum temperature spec.
The same should go for the charge on node capacitors leaking away.
Second, some delta sigma modulators have internal integrators that
have voltages that increase with time, and a maximum clock period
has to be specified to keep them from overflowing.
There are lots of cheap high-resolution low-frequency delta-sigma
ICs available, aimed at scales, geo-electronics, process industry
and other markets. Why make an awkward use of an audio IC.